Max Purcell vs Yoshihito Nishioka — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 April 2018
clay
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN
Yoshihito Nishioka
#177ATP
1689ELO
1618Clay ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
Purcell M.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Nishioka Y.
Purcell M.
63782
Nishioka Y.
26661

Max Purcell defeated Yoshihito Nishioka 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Yoshihito Nishioka came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Max Purcell claimed a first win over Yoshihito Nishioka in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR64clayYoshihito Nishioka4-6 6-2 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Nishioka Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Nishioka Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Nishioka Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
84
Break points saved·Even
92
95
Break points won·Dominant
10
59
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Rubin N.
Dellien H.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rubin N.
Garin C.
6-36-4
Polmans M.
Mmoh M.[4]
5-76-07-60
Purcell M.
Londero J.
1-66-37-5
Dellien H.
Bellucci T.
7-57-62
R16
Polmans M.
Coria F.
6-746-23-1
Londero J.
Polansky P.[2]
6-36-3
Mmoh M.[4]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
Garin C.
Clezar G.
6-46-2
Bellucci T.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
6-36-2
Rubin N.
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-4
Dellien H.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
7-616-2
R32
Londero J.
Choinski J.
1-66-46-1
Purcell M.
Nishioka Y.
6-23-67-66
Mmoh M.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-27-69
Bellucci T.
Thomas D.
6-16-2
Krueger M.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-37-65
Clezar G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Rubin N.
Koepfer D.
7-636-2
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Dougaz A.
6-26-4
Garin C.
King E.[7]
6-06-3
Coria F.
Bryde T.
6-06-1
Dellien H.
Lopez Perez E.
7-56-2
Aragone J.
Santillan A.[6]
5-77-696-3
Polansky P.[2]
Sorgi J.
7-667-66
Clarke J.
Harrison C.
6-33-66-2
Kudla D.[1]
Bagnis F.
3-66-17-5
Polmans M.
Rola B.[5]
6-06-3