Miomir Kecmanovic vs Aziz Dougaz — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB8
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1733Clay ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 April 2018
clay
Aziz Dougaz
TUN
Aziz Dougaz
#644ATP
1390ELO
1380Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Kecmanovic M.
6-2 6-4
Dougaz A.
Kecmanovic M.
662
Dougaz A.
240

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Aziz Dougaz 6-2 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Miomir Kecmanovic came in ranked #59.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Dougaz A.

Dougaz A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Dougaz A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Dougaz A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
86
Break points won·Dominant
67
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Dougaz A.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
100

Kecmanovic M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Dougaz A.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Rubin N.
Dellien H.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rubin N.
Garin C.
6-36-4
Polmans M.
Mmoh M.[4]
5-76-07-60
Purcell M.
Londero J.
1-66-37-5
Dellien H.
Bellucci T.
7-57-62
R16
Polmans M.
Coria F.
6-746-23-1
Londero J.
Polansky P.[2]
6-36-3
Mmoh M.[4]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
Garin C.
Clezar G.
6-46-2
Bellucci T.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
6-36-2
Rubin N.
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-4
Dellien H.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
7-616-2
R32
Londero J.
Choinski J.
1-66-46-1
Purcell M.
Nishioka Y.
6-23-67-66
Mmoh M.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-27-69
Bellucci T.
Thomas D.
6-16-2
Krueger M.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-37-65
Clezar G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Rubin N.
Koepfer D.
7-636-2
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Dougaz A.
6-26-4
Garin C.
King E.[7]
6-06-3
Coria F.
Bryde T.
6-06-1
Dellien H.
Lopez Perez E.
7-56-2
Aragone J.
Santillan A.[6]
5-77-696-3
Polansky P.[2]
Sorgi J.
7-667-66
Clarke J.
Harrison C.
6-33-66-2
Kudla D.[1]
Bagnis F.
3-66-17-5
Polmans M.
Rola B.[5]
6-06-3