Noah Rubin vs Hugo Dellien — Tallahassee CH Semi-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 April 2018
clay
Hugo Dellien
BOL
Hugo Dellien
#144ATP
1637ELO
1624Clay ELO
$217kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLLLL
Rubin N.
6-2 6-4
Dellien H.
Rubin N.
662
Dellien H.
240

Noah Rubin defeated Hugo Dellien 6-2 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Noah Rubin came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Noah Rubin extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-03-18Miami MastersQ1hardNoah Rubin6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Rubin N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Dellien H.

Dellien H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Serve advantage — Dellien H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rubin N.Dellien H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rubin N.Dellien H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
89
Break points won·Even
31
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rubin N.Dellien H.
Freshness·
—
51

Dellien H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 126 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Rubin N.
Dellien H.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rubin N.
Garin C.
6-36-4
Polmans M.
Mmoh M.[4]
5-76-07-60
Purcell M.
Londero J.
1-66-37-5
Dellien H.
Bellucci T.
7-57-62
R16
Polmans M.
Coria F.
6-746-23-1
Londero J.
Polansky P.[2]
6-36-3
Mmoh M.[4]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
Garin C.
Clezar G.
6-46-2
Bellucci T.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
6-36-2
Rubin N.
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-4
Dellien H.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
7-616-2
R32
Londero J.
Choinski J.
1-66-46-1
Purcell M.
Nishioka Y.
6-23-67-66
Mmoh M.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-27-69
Bellucci T.
Thomas D.
6-16-2
Krueger M.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-37-65
Clezar G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Rubin N.
Koepfer D.
7-636-2
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Dougaz A.
6-26-4
Garin C.
King E.[7]
6-06-3
Coria F.
Bryde T.
6-06-1
Dellien H.
Lopez Perez E.
7-56-2
Aragone J.
Santillan A.[6]
5-77-696-3
Polansky P.[2]
Sorgi J.
7-667-66
Clarke J.
Harrison C.
6-33-66-2
Kudla D.[1]
Bagnis F.
3-66-17-5
Polmans M.
Rola B.[5]
6-06-3