Hugo Dellien vs Mitchell Krueger — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Hugo Dellien
BOL
Hugo Dellien
#144ATP
1637ELO
1624Clay ELO
$217kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 April 2018
clay
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1427Clay ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Dellien H.
6-3 6-2
Krueger M.
Dellien H.
662
Krueger M.
320

Hugo Dellien defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-2 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Hugo Dellien came in ranked #144.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dellien H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Dellien H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dellien H.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dellien H.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
16
Break points saved·Even
89
87
Break points won·Clear edge
32
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
47
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Dellien H.Krueger M.
Freshness·Dominant
51
87

Dellien H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 126 games (7d) · Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rubin N.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Rubin N.
Dellien H.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rubin N.
Garin C.
6-36-4
Polmans M.
Mmoh M.[4]
5-76-07-60
Purcell M.
Londero J.
1-66-37-5
Dellien H.
Bellucci T.
7-57-62
R16
Polmans M.
Coria F.
6-746-23-1
Londero J.
Polansky P.[2]
6-36-3
Mmoh M.[4]
Clarke J.
6-26-3
Garin C.
Clezar G.
6-46-2
Bellucci T.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
6-36-2
Rubin N.
Kudla D.[1]
6-26-4
Dellien H.
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
7-616-2
R32
Londero J.
Choinski J.
1-66-46-1
Purcell M.
Nishioka Y.
6-23-67-66
Mmoh M.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-27-69
Bellucci T.
Thomas D.
6-16-2
Krueger M.
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-37-65
Clezar G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Rubin N.
Koepfer D.
7-636-2
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Dougaz A.
6-26-4
Garin C.
King E.[7]
6-06-3
Coria F.
Bryde T.
6-06-1
Dellien H.
Lopez Perez E.
7-56-2
Aragone J.
Santillan A.[6]
5-77-696-3
Polansky P.[2]
Sorgi J.
7-667-66
Clarke J.
Harrison C.
6-33-66-2
Kudla D.[1]
Bagnis F.
3-66-17-5
Polmans M.
Rola B.[5]
6-06-3