Kristina Mladenovic vs Coco Vandeweghe — Fed Cup WG SF: FRA vs USA Round Robin
Fed Cup WG SF: FRA vs USA · WTA · Round Robin
#835WTA
1422ELO
1371Clay ELO
33 yrs · 184 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Saturday, 21 April 2018
clay
Mladenovic K.1-6 6-3 6-2
Vandeweghe C.
Mladenovic K.
1662
Vandeweghe C.
6321
Kristina Mladenovic defeated Coco Vandeweghe 1-6 6-3 6-2 in the Fed Cup WG SF: FRA vs USA round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Coco Vandeweghe came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Kristina Mladenovic narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.
Key context
- Match story: Kristina Mladenovic dropped the opening set before beating Coco Vandeweghe 1–6 6–3 6–2.
Head to head
2–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-07 | Madrid | R64 | clay | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-5 6-0 |
| 2016-09-26 | Wuhan | R64 | hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-6(5) 6-3 |
| 2016-06-06 | 's Hertogenbosch | F | grass | Coco Vandeweghe | 7-5 7-5 |
| 2016-02-15 | Dubai | R16 | hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 7-5 3-6 6-4 |
| 2014-10-06 | Osaka | R32 | hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-2 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
53%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
39%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
6.6
5.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
27
33
Break points saved·Dominant
26
63
Break points won·Dominant
69
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
48
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
65
33
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About