Zsombor Piros vs Andreas Haider Maurer — Barletta CH Qualifying Round 2

Barletta CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 April 2018
clay
AUT
Andreas Haider Maurer
39 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWLL
Piros Z.
6-3 7-6
Haider Maurer A.
Piros Z.
6782
Haider Maurer A.
3660

Zsombor Piros defeated Andreas Haider Maurer 6-3 7-6 in the Barletta CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Haider Maurer A.

Haider Maurer A.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Haider Maurer A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
42%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Haider Maurer A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
73
Break points won·Slight edge
32
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Haider Maurer A.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Otte O.[1]
6-26-4
Coppejans K.[5]
Chazal M.
6-26-1
Piros Z.
Tepavac M.
6-47-5
Trungelliti M.[3]
Gaio F.[7]
4-66-46-3
Q2
Trungelliti M.[3]
Carli C.
6-06-4
Tepavac M.
Di Nicola G.
7-56-3
Coppejans K.[5]
Baldi F.
6-26-2
Chazal M.
De Greef A.[4]
6-36-777-5
Gaio F.[7]
Muller A.
7-686-3
Piros Z.
Haider Maurer A.
6-37-66
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Vasilenko A.
6-16-3
Otte O.[1]
Toledo Bague P.
7-627-66
Q1
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Masur D.
7-665-76-2
Haider Maurer A.
Semmler M.
6-47-5
De Greef A.[4]
Vavassori A.
6-16-2
Coppejans K.[5]
Guerrieri A.
6-46-1
Di Nicola G.
Benchetrit E.[8]
4-67-626-3
Muller A.
Molchanov D.
6-06-0
Gaio F.[7]
Garzelli F.
6-26-2
Baldi F.
Tresca G.
6-26-776-2
Chazal M.
Lapalombella S.
6-06-1
Carli C.
Kirkin E.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[3]
Ricca G.
7-636-2
Tepavac M.
Valkusz M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.[2]
6-36-4
Vasilenko A.
Slobodchikov R.
1-67-626-4
Toledo Bague P.
Karatsev A.
7-613-2
Otte O.[1]
Brancaccio R.
6-27-5