Tatsuma Ito vs Jason Jung — Taipei CH Quarter-final

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN8
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 April 2018
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Ito T.
3-6 7-6 7-6
Jung J.
Ito T.
3711772
Jung J.
669641

Tatsuma Ito defeated Jason Jung 3-6 7-6 7-6 in the Taipei CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jason Jung came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32, but Tatsuma Ito had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on hard. Tatsuma Ito claimed a first win over Jason Jung in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonQ2grassJason Jung6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
21
Break points saved·Even
61
64
Break points won·Even
9
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
43
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bhambri Y.[4]
Ramanathan R.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Ramanathan R.[6]
Soeda G.[7]
7-696-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Ito T.[8]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.[7]
Donskoy E.[2]
7-646-4
Ramanathan R.[6]
Sela D.[3]
6-46-2
Ito T.[8]
Jung J.
3-67-697-64
Bhambri Y.[4]
Lo C.
6-46-2
R16
Ramanathan R.[6]
Harris L.
7-636-737-65
Bhambri Y.[4]
Bachinger M.
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[2]
Myneni S.
6-26-4
Sela D.[3]
Wu T.
6-31-66-3
Lo C.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-756-3
Ito T.[8]
Kwon S.
4-67-646-4
Jung J.
Ebden M.[1]
6-27-64
Soeda G.[7]
Chen T.
6-36-1
R32
Jung J.
Grills J.
6-06-3
Myneni S.
Gunneswaran P.
4-67-626-4
Sela D.[3]
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-2
Harris L.
Mukund S.
6-47-63
Takahashi Y.
Tseng C.
7-646-1
Bachinger M.
Majchrzak K.
4-66-27-65
Bhambri Y.[4]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-756-36-3
Ito T.[8]
Grigelis L.
6-756-46-3
Ebden M.[1]
Yang T.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-16-1
Lo C.
Halys Q.[5]
6-31-66-3
Kwon S.
Bolt A.
7-654-66-3
Ramanathan R.[6]
Fancutt T.
7-656-706-2
Soeda G.[7]
Kelly D.
7-646-4
Chen T.
Roelofse R.
7-686-3
Wu T.
Whittington A.
6-37-61