Camila Giorgi vs Alison Van Uytvanck — Lugano Round of 16

Lugano · WTA · Round of 16
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 April 2018
clay
BEL9
Alison Van Uytvanck
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
Giorgi C.
6-2 6-1
Van Uytvanck A.
Giorgi C.
662
Van Uytvanck A.
210

Camila Giorgi defeated Alison Van Uytvanck 6-2 6-1 in the Lugano round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camila Giorgi came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Camila Giorgi extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-08-31US OpenR128hardCamila Giorgi2-6 6-1 7-5
2018-10-08LinzSFhardCamila Giorgi6-3 6-4
2015-03-23MiamiR64hardCamila Giorgi6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Giorgi C.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Van Uytvanck A.

Van Uytvanck A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giorgi C.Van Uytvanck A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giorgi C.Van Uytvanck A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
71
77
Break points won·Dominant
81
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Sabalenka A.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Sabalenka A.
Voegele S.
6-46-2
Mertens E.[2]
Lapko V.
6-14-66-4
Quarter-finals
Voegele S.
Korpatsch T.
6-46-3
Sabalenka A.
Giorgi C.
6-36-0
Mertens E.[2]
Barthel M.
6-45-77-60
Lapko V.
Flipkens K.
6-47-64
R16
Lapko V.
Kovinic D.
6-26-3
Korpatsch T.
Von Deichmann K.
7-626-4
Giorgi C.
Van Uytvanck A.[9]
6-26-1
Flipkens K.
Sasnovich A.[8]
4-66-46-2
Mertens E.[2]
Vondrousova M.
6-25-77-5
Sabalenka A.
Hercog P.
6-36-1
Voegele S.
Cornet A.[6]
2-67-56-3
Barthel M.
Vekic D.
6-34-66-4
R32
Von Deichmann K.
Siegemund L.
7-652-3
Korpatsch T.
Mladenovic K.[1]
7-653-2
Lapko V.
Kontaveit A.[4]
3-66-46-3
Sasnovich A.[8]
Hogenkamp R.
7-646-0
Vekic D.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
6-07-5
Giorgi C.
Pliskova K.
6-36-2
Barthel M.
Kuznetsova S.[5]
4-66-36-4
Cornet A.[6]
Teichmann J.
7-626-0
Flipkens K.
Witthoeft C.
1-66-46-3
Van Uytvanck A.[9]
Dodin O.
6-46-2
Mertens E.[2]
Minella M.
6-46-1
Hercog P.
Hsieh S.
7-56-0
Kovinic D.
Golubic V.
7-663-66-4
Voegele S.
Frech M.
6-36-3
Vondrousova M.
Putintseva Y.
4-67-626-3
Sabalenka A.
Buzarnescu M.[7]
5-76-36-2