Maxime Chazal vs Arthur De Greef — Barletta CH Qualifying Round 2

Barletta CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
FRA
Maxime Chazal
#469ATP
1294ELO
1262Clay ELO
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 April 2018
clay
BEL4
Arthur De Greef
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Chazal M.
6-3 6-7 7-5
De Greef A.
Chazal M.
66772
De Greef A.
37951

Maxime Chazal defeated Arthur De Greef 6-3 6-7 7-5 in the Barletta CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur De Greef came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Chazal closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chazal M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs De Greef A.

De Greef A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Chazal M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chazal M.De Greef A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chazal M.De Greef A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
2
25
Break points saved·Clear edge
40
56
Break points won·Even
22
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Chazal M.De Greef A.
Freshness·
73
—

Chazal M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Otte O.[1]
6-26-4
Coppejans K.[5]
Chazal M.
6-26-1
Piros Z.
Tepavac M.
6-47-5
Trungelliti M.[3]
Gaio F.[7]
4-66-46-3
Q2
Trungelliti M.[3]
Carli C.
6-06-4
Tepavac M.
Di Nicola G.
7-56-3
Coppejans K.[5]
Baldi F.
6-26-2
Chazal M.
De Greef A.[4]
6-36-777-5
Gaio F.[7]
Muller A.
7-686-3
Piros Z.
Haider Maurer A.
6-37-66
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Vasilenko A.
6-16-3
Otte O.[1]
Toledo Bague P.
7-627-66
Q1
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Masur D.
7-665-76-2
Haider Maurer A.
Semmler M.
6-47-5
De Greef A.[4]
Vavassori A.
6-16-2
Coppejans K.[5]
Guerrieri A.
6-46-1
Di Nicola G.
Benchetrit E.[8]
4-67-626-3
Muller A.
Molchanov D.
6-06-0
Gaio F.[7]
Garzelli F.
6-26-2
Baldi F.
Tresca G.
6-26-776-2
Chazal M.
Lapalombella S.
6-06-1
Carli C.
Kirkin E.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[3]
Ricca G.
7-636-2
Tepavac M.
Valkusz M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.[2]
6-36-4
Vasilenko A.
Slobodchikov R.
1-67-626-4
Toledo Bague P.
Karatsev A.
7-613-2
Otte O.[1]
Brancaccio R.
6-27-5