Kimmer Coppejans vs Maxime Chazal — Barletta CH Qualifying Final

Barletta CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL5
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 April 2018
clay
FRA
Maxime Chazal
#469ATP
1294ELO
1262Clay ELO
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
Coppejans K.
6-2 6-1
Chazal M.
Coppejans K.
662
Chazal M.
210

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Maxime Chazal 6-2 6-1 in the Barletta CH qualifying final on clay. The result followed the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in ranked #199, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Chazal M.

Chazal M.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Chazal M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Chazal M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
2
Break points saved·Dominant
67
40
Break points won·Slight edge
29
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Chazal M.
Freshness·Even
76
73

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Chazal M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Otte O.[1]
6-26-4
Coppejans K.[5]
Chazal M.
6-26-1
Piros Z.
Tepavac M.
6-47-5
Trungelliti M.[3]
Gaio F.[7]
4-66-46-3
Q2
Trungelliti M.[3]
Carli C.
6-06-4
Tepavac M.
Di Nicola G.
7-56-3
Coppejans K.[5]
Baldi F.
6-26-2
Chazal M.
De Greef A.[4]
6-36-777-5
Gaio F.[7]
Muller A.
7-686-3
Piros Z.
Haider Maurer A.
6-37-66
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Vasilenko A.
6-16-3
Otte O.[1]
Toledo Bague P.
7-627-66
Q1
Gimeno Traver D.[6]
Masur D.
7-665-76-2
Haider Maurer A.
Semmler M.
6-47-5
De Greef A.[4]
Vavassori A.
6-16-2
Coppejans K.[5]
Guerrieri A.
6-46-1
Di Nicola G.
Benchetrit E.[8]
4-67-626-3
Muller A.
Molchanov D.
6-06-0
Gaio F.[7]
Garzelli F.
6-26-2
Baldi F.
Tresca G.
6-26-776-2
Chazal M.
Lapalombella S.
6-06-1
Carli C.
Kirkin E.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[3]
Ricca G.
7-636-2
Tepavac M.
Valkusz M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.[2]
6-36-4
Vasilenko A.
Slobodchikov R.
1-67-626-4
Toledo Bague P.
Karatsev A.
7-613-2
Otte O.[1]
Brancaccio R.
6-27-5