Sumit Nagal vs Gianluigi Quinzi — Marbella CH Qualifying Round 1

Marbella CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Sumit Nagal
IND2
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 March 2018
clay
ITA
Gianluigi Quinzi
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Nagal S.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Quinzi G.
Nagal S.
6362
Quinzi G.
3631

Sumit Nagal defeated Gianluigi Quinzi 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Marbella CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Quinzi G.

Quinzi G.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Quinzi G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Quinzi G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
11
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
53
Break points won·Clear edge
35
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Quinzi G.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Rosol L.[5]
Gaio F.
6-47-64
Trungelliti M.
Giner M.
6-46-2
Cachin P.[8]
Nagal S.[2]
4-66-36-4
Coppejans K.
De Greef A.[6]
4-66-16-4
Q2
Rosol L.[5]
Jahn J.
6-46-3
Giner M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-17-63
Trungelliti M.
Donati M.[7]
6-47-5
Nagal S.[2]
Djokovic M.
6-34-66-1
Gaio F.
Samper Montana J.
6-37-64
Cachin P.[8]
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
6-16-3
De Greef A.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.
Pavlasek A.[1]
6-46-3
Q1
Coppejans K.
Vilella Martinez M.
2-66-36-1
Giner M.
Cannell J.
6-42-66-4
Pavlasek A.[1]
Benchetrit E.
6-17-5
Esteve Lobato E.
Haider Maurer A.
6-37-5
Gaio F.
Olaso G.
7-57-64
Jahn J.
Gakhov I.
4-66-16-3
Cachin P.[8]
Vega Hernandez D.
6-36-4
Samper Montana J.
Rubin N.[4]
6-23-66-2
Trungelliti M.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-787-56-1
De Greef A.[6]
Romero De Avila Senise A.
6-26-4
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
Andujar P.
7-666-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Safranek V.[3]
7-56-1
Djokovic M.
Cervantes Huegun I.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[2]
Quinzi G.
6-33-66-3
Rosol L.[5]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-656-3
Donati M.[7]
Semmler M.
6-46-4