Pedro Sakamoto vs Pedja Krstin — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 16

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 March 2018
clay
SRB8
Pedja Krstin
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Sakamoto P.
4-6 6-3 7-5
Krstin P.
Sakamoto P.
4672
Krstin P.
6351

Pedro Sakamoto defeated Pedja Krstin 4-6 6-3 7-5 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Pedja Krstin came in defending last year's round of 32, but Pedro Sakamoto had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 4 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sakamoto P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Krstin P.

Krstin P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sakamoto P.Krstin P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sakamoto P.Krstin P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
13
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
48
27
Break points won·Even
22
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sakamoto P.Krstin P.
Freshness·
94
—

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Arevalo M.
Cid R.
6-36-736-4
Semi-finals
Cid R.
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Arevalo M.
Galan D.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto P.
Clarke J.
6-37-64
Cid R.
Hernandez J.
2-66-36-4
Galan D.
Escobar G.
6-26-3
Arevalo M.
Choinski J.
6-23-66-3
R16
Cid R.
Bagnis F.
6-757-56-1
Arevalo M.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-37-64
Galan D.
Bellucci T.[4]
6-36-3
Escobar G.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Krstin P.[8]
4-66-37-5
Clarke J.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
7-52-66-4
Hernandez J.
Krajicek A.
6-06-2
Choinski J.
Sanchez M.
6-47-5
R32
Choinski J.
Melzer G.[2]
6-13-1
Clarke J.
Hank T.
6-22-66-2
Sanchez M.
Nedelko I.
6-06-2
Arevalo M.
Estrella V.[5]
6-16-4
Bellucci T.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Escobar G.
Gomez L.
6-37-64
Gonzalez A.
King E.[6]
6-36-3
Krstin P.[8]
Lopez Villasenor G.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Coria F.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-726-16-3
Cid R.
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Galan D.
Souza J.
6-727-647-5
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Quiroz R.
1-67-56-3
Munoz de la Nava D.
Krawietz K.
6-47-5
Hernandez J.
Arguello F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.
Krueger M.[7]
6-11-66-3