Pedro Sakamoto vs Emilio Gomez — San Luis Potosi CH Qualifying Round 2

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 March 2018
clay
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Sakamoto P.
6-2 6-2
Gomez E.
Sakamoto P.
662
Gomez E.
220

Pedro Sakamoto defeated Emilio Gomez 6-2 6-2 in the San Luis Potosi CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Pedro Sakamoto came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Pedro Sakamoto extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22CordobaQ1clayPedro Sakamoto3-6 6-1 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Sakamoto P.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sakamoto P.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sakamoto P.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
13
32
Break points saved·Dominant
48
77
Break points won·Even
22
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
11
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
57
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sakamoto P.Gomez E.
Freshness·
94
—

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q3
Cid R.
Rodriguez C.
6-726-26-3
Krawietz K.
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-796-37-64
Sakamoto P.
Lama G.
6-47-67
Escobar G.
Echazu M.
6-36-2
Q2
Krawietz K.
Bortolotti M.
6-26-3
Echazu M.
Statham J.
7-652-67-65
Rodriguez C.
Endara I.
6-36-2
Cid R.
Martinez L.
6-14-66-4
Escobar G.
Isaias Rosas Zarur R.
6-16-0
Gomez Gb42 A.
Mantilla F.
4-66-37-61
Lama G.
Zeballos F.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Gomez E.
6-26-2
Q1
Sakamoto P.
Londero J.
4-67-57-5
Krawietz K.
Aramburu Contreras I.
6-07-64
Statham J.
Aramburu A.
6-06-1
Zeballos F.
Astorga M.
6-46-4
Isaias Rosas Zarur R.
Mendoza A.
3-66-16-3
Gomez E.
Agamenone F.
6-46-2
Echazu M.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
7-646-1
Lama G.
Torebko P.
6-33-67-69
Endara I.
Fransen S.
6-06-0
Rodriguez C.
Arias B.
4-66-16-2
Bortolotti M.
Krainik P.
6-16-2
Gomez Gb42 A.
Pasha N.
6-37-66
Mantilla F.
Sorgi J.
7-647-64