Roberto Cid vs Pedro Sakamoto — San Luis Potosi CH Semi-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 March 2018
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Cid R.
6-3 6-3
Sakamoto P.
Cid R.
662
Sakamoto P.
330

Roberto Cid defeated Pedro Sakamoto 6-3 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Roberto Cid came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cid R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cid R.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (193 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cid R.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
13
Break points saved·Dominant
15
48
Break points won·Even
26
22
Deciding sets·Slight edge
4
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cid R.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·
—
94

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Arevalo M.
Cid R.
6-36-736-4
Semi-finals
Cid R.
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Arevalo M.
Galan D.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto P.
Clarke J.
6-37-64
Cid R.
Hernandez J.
2-66-36-4
Galan D.
Escobar G.
6-26-3
Arevalo M.
Choinski J.
6-23-66-3
R16
Cid R.
Bagnis F.
6-757-56-1
Arevalo M.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-37-64
Galan D.
Bellucci T.[4]
6-36-3
Escobar G.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Krstin P.[8]
4-66-37-5
Clarke J.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
7-52-66-4
Hernandez J.
Krajicek A.
6-06-2
Choinski J.
Sanchez M.
6-47-5
R32
Choinski J.
Melzer G.[2]
6-13-1
Clarke J.
Hank T.
6-22-66-2
Sanchez M.
Nedelko I.
6-06-2
Arevalo M.
Estrella V.[5]
6-16-4
Bellucci T.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Escobar G.
Gomez L.
6-37-64
Gonzalez A.
King E.[6]
6-36-3
Krstin P.[8]
Lopez Villasenor G.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Coria F.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-726-16-3
Cid R.
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Galan D.
Souza J.
6-727-647-5
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Quiroz R.
1-67-56-3
Munoz de la Nava D.
Krawietz K.
6-47-5
Hernandez J.
Arguello F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.
Krueger M.[7]
6-11-66-3