Pedro Cachin vs Sumit Nagal — Marbella CH Qualifying Final

Marbella CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
ARG8
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 March 2018
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND2
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Cachin P.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Nagal S.
Cachin P.
4662
Nagal S.
6341

Pedro Cachin defeated Sumit Nagal 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Marbella CH qualifying final on clay. Pedro Cachin extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayPedro Cachin6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
22
33
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
69
Break points won·Clear edge
21
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cachin P.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Rosol L.[5]
Gaio F.
6-47-64
Trungelliti M.
Giner M.
6-46-2
Cachin P.[8]
Nagal S.[2]
4-66-36-4
Coppejans K.
De Greef A.[6]
4-66-16-4
Q2
Rosol L.[5]
Jahn J.
6-46-3
Giner M.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-17-63
Trungelliti M.
Donati M.[7]
6-47-5
Nagal S.[2]
Djokovic M.
6-34-66-1
Gaio F.
Samper Montana J.
6-37-64
Cachin P.[8]
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
6-16-3
De Greef A.[6]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.
Pavlasek A.[1]
6-46-3
Q1
Coppejans K.
Vilella Martinez M.
2-66-36-1
Giner M.
Cannell J.
6-42-66-4
Pavlasek A.[1]
Benchetrit E.
6-17-5
Esteve Lobato E.
Haider Maurer A.
6-37-5
Gaio F.
Olaso G.
7-57-64
Jahn J.
Gakhov I.
4-66-16-3
Cachin P.[8]
Vega Hernandez D.
6-36-4
Samper Montana J.
Rubin N.[4]
6-23-66-2
Trungelliti M.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-787-56-1
De Greef A.[6]
Romero De Avila Senise A.
6-26-4
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
Andujar P.
7-666-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Safranek V.[3]
7-56-1
Djokovic M.
Cervantes Huegun I.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[2]
Quinzi G.
6-33-66-3
Rosol L.[5]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-656-3
Donati M.[7]
Semmler M.
6-46-4