Marcelo Arevalo vs Jan Choinski — San Luis Potosi CH Quarter-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESA
Marcelo Arevalo
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 March 2018
clay
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Arevalo M.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Choinski J.
Arevalo M.
6362
Choinski J.
2631

Marcelo Arevalo defeated Jan Choinski 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Marcelo Arevalo came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Marcelo Arevalo closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Arevalo M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Arevalo M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Arevalo M.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Arevalo M.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
90
Break points won·Slight edge
15
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
14
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Arevalo M.Choinski J.
Freshness·
—
55

Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Arevalo M.
Cid R.
6-36-736-4
Semi-finals
Cid R.
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Arevalo M.
Galan D.
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto P.
Clarke J.
6-37-64
Cid R.
Hernandez J.
2-66-36-4
Galan D.
Escobar G.
6-26-3
Arevalo M.
Choinski J.
6-23-66-3
R16
Cid R.
Bagnis F.
6-757-56-1
Arevalo M.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-37-64
Galan D.
Bellucci T.[4]
6-36-3
Escobar G.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Krstin P.[8]
4-66-37-5
Clarke J.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
7-52-66-4
Hernandez J.
Krajicek A.
6-06-2
Choinski J.
Sanchez M.
6-47-5
R32
Choinski J.
Melzer G.[2]
6-13-1
Clarke J.
Hank T.
6-22-66-2
Sanchez M.
Nedelko I.
6-06-2
Arevalo M.
Estrella V.[5]
6-16-4
Bellucci T.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Escobar G.
Gomez L.
6-37-64
Gonzalez A.
King E.[6]
6-36-3
Krstin P.[8]
Lopez Villasenor G.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Coria F.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-726-16-3
Cid R.
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Galan D.
Souza J.
6-727-647-5
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Quiroz R.
1-67-56-3
Munoz de la Nava D.
Krawietz K.
6-47-5
Hernandez J.
Arguello F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.
Krueger M.[7]
6-11-66-3