Tatsuma Ito vs Di Wu — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 March 2018
hard
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Ito T.
7-6 5-7 7-5
Wu D.
Ito T.
77572
Wu D.
65751

Tatsuma Ito defeated Di Wu 7-6 5-7 7-5 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Di Wu came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Tatsuma Ito claimed a first win over Di Wu in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-09-23ZhuhaiR32hardDi Wu3-6 6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Wu D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
37
Break points won·Clear edge
9
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Kavcic B.
6-22-66-3
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Hurkacz H.
7-6112-66-2
Ivashka I.[7]
Ito T.
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-4
Kavcic B.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Ito T.
Zopp J.[8]
6-36-4
Zhang Z.
Galovic V.
6-46-766-3
Ivashka I.[7]
Caruso S.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-717-56-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Mukund S.
6-46-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Safwat M.
1-66-37-64
Kavcic B.
Valkusz M.
6-20-0
Nedovyesov A.
Zhang Z.
7-637-64
R16
Ito T.
Ignatik U.
1-66-36-4
Zopp J.[8]
Li Z.
7-50-67-5
Zhang Z.
Otte O.[6]
6-17-5
Galovic V.
Kecmanovic M.
6-16-2
Jaziri M.[1]
Lee D.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Maden Y.[5]
6-36-4
Ivashka I.[7]
Moraing M.
5-0
Caruso S.
Moriya H.
6-33-66-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Yang T.
6-716-46-2
Mukund S.
Peliwo F.[8]
6-45-76-3
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Gaio F.
4-67-56-2
Nedovyesov A.
Sugita Y.[6]
7-646-4
Zhang Z.
Broady L.
6-41-66-1
Valkusz M.
Fabbiano T.[2]
7-657-5
Safwat M.
Ramanathan R.[3]
7-636-4
Kavcic B.
Tatlot J.
6-16-2
R32
Zopp J.[8]
Bolt A.
2-67-56-4
Caruso S.
Soeda G.
6-44-66-4
Moraing M.
Kwon S.
6-06-3
Ivashka I.[7]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Ignatik U.
Kavcic B.[3]
7-633-66-3
Ito T.
Wu D.
7-655-77-5
Otte O.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-36-0
Galovic V.
Kubler J.
3-67-56-3
Kecmanovic M.
Granollers M.[4]
6-36-4
Maden Y.[5]
Rola B.
6-26-3
Hurkacz H.
Sonego L.
6-747-646-3
Jaziri M.[1]
Milojevic N.
7-51-67-5
Zhang Z.
Munar J.
3-66-46-2
Li Z.
Vatutin A.
6-26-3
Lee D.
Jung J.
4-67-56-4
Moriya H.
Thompson J.[2]
4-66-26-3
Tatlot J.
Myneni S.
6-00-0
Gaio F.
Lee D.
6-13-0
Kavcic B.
Soeda G.[7]
6-36-3
Valkusz M.
Li Z.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[3]
Nagal S.
3-66-47-62
Broady L.
Wu D.
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Nedovyesov A.
Oliveira G.
6-37-62
Peliwo F.[8]
Te R.
6-37-64
Zhang Z.
Albot R.[1]
6-44-66-2
Safwat M.
Mu T.
6-16-3
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Yang T.
Kwon S.
7-56-3
Mukund S.
Wu Y.
7-646-2
Fabbiano T.[2]
Xia Z.
6-36-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Schnur B.
6-36-2