Cem Ilkel vs Blake Ellis — Yokohama CH Round of 32

Yokohama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 February 2018
hard
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Ilkel C.
6-3 6-4
Ellis B.
Ilkel C.
662
Ellis B.
340

Cem Ilkel defeated Blake Ellis 6-3 6-4 in the Yokohama CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
41
Break points saved·Dominant
49
79
Break points won·Even
3
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Ellis B.
Freshness·
—
92

Ellis B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.
Ito T.[7]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.
Thompson J.[1]
6-47-5
Ito T.[7]
Ilkel C.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.
Kamke T.
7-636-2
Thompson J.[1]
Robert S.[5]
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.
Soeda G.[4]
4-67-606-3
R16
Moriya H.
Millman J.[2]
W/O
Robert S.[5]
Nguyen D.
7-56-0
Ito T.[7]
Kubler J.
3-66-37-63
Kamke T.
Jung J.[3]
6-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Hazawa S.
6-37-5
Soeda G.[4]
Wu D.
7-656-3
Ilkel C.
Lee D.[8]
6-22-67-65
Thompson J.[1]
Ehara H.
6-46-2
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
2-66-46-3
Lee D.[8]
Puetz T.
4-66-46-3
Moriya H.
Kravchuk K.
6-06-2
Kubler J.
Leshem E.
6-31-66-3
Kamke T.
Donati M.
6-796-27-5
Ilkel C.
Ellis B.
6-36-4
Hazawa S.
Kwon S.[6]
6-34-67-65
Uchiyama Y.
Hurkacz H.
6-43-66-4
Wu D.
Zhang Z.
6-47-65
Ehara H.
Whittington A.
7-686-716-4
Nguyen D.
Watanuki Y.
6-26-4
Jung J.[3]
Chung Y.
6-26-766-4
Ito T.[7]
Uesugi K.
6-26-3
Soeda G.[4]
Itsusaki K.
6-06-2
Robert S.[5]
Yamasaki J.
3-66-16-3
Millman J.[2]
Purcell M.
6-37-67