Gleb Sakharov vs Ugo Humbert — Rennes CH Round of 32

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Gleb Sakharov
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 January 2018
hard
Ugo Humbert
FRA
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Sakharov G.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Humbert U.
Sakharov G.
6462
Humbert U.
3631

Gleb Sakharov defeated Ugo Humbert 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Rennes CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Gleb Sakharov closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sakharov G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sakharov G.

Serve advantage — Humbert U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sakharov G.Humbert U.
—
Serve
64
—
Return
15

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sakharov G.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sakharov G.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
70
Break points saved·Dominant
57
99
Break points won·Clear edge
18
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sakharov G.Humbert U.
Freshness·
—
96

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[2]
Berankis R.[7]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[2]
Hoang A.
6-47-64
Berankis R.[7]
Broady L.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Hoang A.
Maden Y.
6-33-66-2
Berankis R.[7]
Sakharov G.
6-14-66-4
Pospisil V.[2]
Halys Q.[6]
6-16-4
Broady L.
Guinard M.
6-46-4
R16
Halys Q.[6]
Vatutin A.
4-66-47-68
Hoang A.
Gombos N.[8]
6-24-66-3
Broady L.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Guinard M.
Gulbis E.
3-66-36-4
Berankis R.[7]
Bolelli S.
7-56-3
Sakharov G.
Youzhny M.[1]
6-46-1
Pospisil V.[2]
Moraing M.
7-647-60
Maden Y.
Ymer E.
6-46-4
R32
Bolelli S.
Ofner S.
6-27-61
Vatutin A.
Ignatik U.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[6]
Lamasine T.
6-17-65
Ymer E.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
6-13-66-3
Maden Y.
Milojevic N.
6-756-26-4
Hoang A.
De Greef A.
7-673-66-3
Gombos N.[8]
De Schepper K.
6-26-3
Broady L.
Brown D.[5]
6-34-67-5
Janvier M.
Robredo T.
7-656-4
Gulbis E.
Ymer M.
6-747-56-2
Sakharov G.
Humbert U.
6-34-66-3
Youzhny M.[1]
Moutet C.
6-16-2
Moraing M.
Hemery C.
6-756-16-4
Berankis R.[7]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Pospisil V.[2]
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Guinard M.
Elias G.[3]
6-16-4