Ante Pavic vs Elias Ymer — Bangalore CH Round of 16

Bangalore CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO
Ante Pavic
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 November 2017
hard
Elias Ymer
SWE4
Elias Ymer
#188ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
Pavic A.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Ymer E.
Pavic A.
662772
Ymer E.
377651

Ante Pavic defeated Elias Ymer 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Bangalore CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ante Pavic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ante Pavic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Ante Pavic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-04ChennaiQ1hardAnte Pavic7-5 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Pavic A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pavic A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pavic A.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pavic A.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
7
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
62
83
Break points won·Clear edge
2
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Pavic A.Ymer E.
Freshness·
—
100

Ymer E.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
Clarke J.
6-33-66-2
Semi-finals
Clarke J.
Yang T.
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Bhambri Y.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.
Pavic A.
6-24-67-61
Bhambri Y.[3]
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-2
Nagal S.
Kavcic B.[1]
6-36-4
Yang T.
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
R16
Clarke J.
Ramanathan R.[5]
6-736-26-4
Bhambri Y.[3]
Martinez P.
6-27-60
Kavcic B.[1]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-43-66-3
Yang T.
Gojo B.
2-66-46-2
Gunneswaran P.
Polmans M.
6-26-716-1
Nagal S.
Klein B.
6-44-67-5
Pavic A.
Ymer E.[4]
6-36-727-65
Escoffier A.
Nedovyesov A.[8]
6-32-66-3
R32
Klein B.
Krstin P.[7]
6-41-0
Gojo B.
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
6-31-67-5
Nedovyesov A.[8]
Sabanov M.
6-46-1
Pavic A.
Uchida K.
6-36-4
Clarke J.
Rawat S.
6-36-3
Bhambri Y.[3]
Balaji N.
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-26-0
Vilella Martinez M.
Vardhan V.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.[1]
Brkic T.
6-26-707-66
Ymer E.[4]
Prabodh S.
6-47-62
Yang T.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-613-0
Polmans M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-626-3
Escoffier A.
Singh D.
6-36-4
Martinez P.
Nakagawa N.
7-656-3
Gunneswaran P.
King E.[6]
6-46-4
Ramanathan R.[5]
Grenier H.
4-66-46-3