Tim Smyczek vs Cameron Norrie — Champaign CH Semi-final

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA7
Tim Smyczek
38 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2017
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR4
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Smyczek T.
7-5 6-7 6-3
Norrie C.
Smyczek T.
76562
Norrie C.
57731

Tim Smyczek defeated Cameron Norrie 7-5 6-7 6-3 in the Champaign CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Cameron Norrie came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Tim Smyczek closed it out in three sets, 7–5 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smyczek T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Smyczek T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Smyczek T.Norrie C.
—
Serve
45
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Smyczek T.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Even
5.1
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smyczek T.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
99
Break points won·Dominant
23
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
35
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
42
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Smyczek T.Norrie C.
Freshness·
—
100

Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Smyczek T.[7]
Fratangelo B.[5]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Fratangelo B.[5]
Fritz T.[3]
3-66-36-2
Smyczek T.[7]
Norrie C.[4]
7-56-756-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[3]
Paul T.[8]
6-13-0
Norrie C.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Smyczek T.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Peliwo F.
4-67-57-64
R16
Norrie C.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-26-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Smith J.
7-57-65
Smyczek T.[7]
Nevolo D.
6-37-64
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
W/O
Paul T.[8]
Ymer M.
6-43-67-60
Fritz T.[3]
Schneider R.
6-46-3
Peliwo F.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-37-5
R32
Laaksonen H.[2]
Moraing M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-26-1
Fritz T.[3]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-1
Schneider R.
Santanna B.
4-66-36-1
Paul T.[8]
Koepfer D.
6-26-4
Smith J.
Giron M.
6-36-1
Hiltzik J.
Krueger M.
3-66-47-62
Norrie C.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Peliwo F.
Eubanks C.
7-53-66-3
Klahn B.
Scholtz N.
6-26-3
Smyczek T.[7]
Ward A.
6-47-64
Fratangelo B.[5]
Fanselow S.
3-67-606-1
Nevolo D.
Monette S.
4-66-46-0
Ymer M.
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Hiltzik A.
6-16-716-0
Harrison C.
Corrie E.
3-66-46-4