Max Purcell vs Jason Jung — Toyota CH Round of 32

Toyota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2017
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Purcell M.
6-4 3-6 6-2
Jung J.
Purcell M.
6362
Jung J.
4621

Max Purcell defeated Jason Jung 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Toyota CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
21
Break points saved·Dominant
92
64
Break points won·Even
10
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Purcell M.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ebden M.[2]
Hemery C.[7]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Ebden M.[2]
Hurkacz H.
4-66-47-62
Hemery C.[7]
Millman J.[5]
7-646-746-2
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[5]
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Hemery C.[7]
Whittington A.
3-66-37-5
Hurkacz H.
Ito T.[3]
6-04-0
Ebden M.[2]
Lee D.[8]
6-36-0
R16
Millman J.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-656-7117-69
Hemery C.[7]
Mousley B.
7-636-1
Purcell M.
Soeda G.[4]
6-27-66
Ebden M.[2]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Lee D.[8]
Li Z.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Kwon S.[6]
6-756-47-5
Whittington A.
Imai S.
6-36-3
Ito T.[3]
Ehara H.
6-26-1
R32
Purcell M.
Jung J.
6-43-66-2
Shimizu Y.
Yamasaki J.
6-36-2
Mousley B.
Jasika O.
4-66-46-4
Ehara H.
Takeuchi K.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Takahashi Y.
6-17-66
Li Z.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-2
Hurkacz H.
Uesugi K.
6-36-0
Kwon S.[6]
Krajicek A.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Soeda G.[4]
Leshem E.
7-616-4
Hemery C.[7]
Bolt A.
6-47-64
Whittington A.
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Lee D.[8]
Kibi Y.
6-36-4
Imai S.
Daniel T.[1]
6-37-64
Millman J.[5]
Tashiro Y.
6-36-2
Ito T.[3]
Robert S.
6-35-76-2