Hubert Hurkacz vs Tatsuma Ito — Toyota CH Quarter-final

Toyota CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Hubert Hurkacz
POL
Hubert Hurkacz
#68ATP
1798ELO
1727Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$20MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 13 November 2017
hard
JPN3
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Hurkacz H.
6-0 4-0
Ito T.
Hurkacz H.
64–
Ito T.
00–

Hubert Hurkacz advanced when Tatsuma Ito retired 6-0 4-0 in the Toyota CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hurkacz H.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Hurkacz H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Hurkacz H.Ito T.
67
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hurkacz H.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.9
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hurkacz H.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
24
Break points saved·Dominant
100
61
Break points won·Dominant
40
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hurkacz H.Ito T.
Freshness·
81
—

Hurkacz H.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ebden M.[2]
Hemery C.[7]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Ebden M.[2]
Hurkacz H.
4-66-47-62
Hemery C.[7]
Millman J.[5]
7-646-746-2
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[5]
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Hemery C.[7]
Whittington A.
3-66-37-5
Hurkacz H.
Ito T.[3]
6-04-0
Ebden M.[2]
Lee D.[8]
6-36-0
R16
Millman J.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-656-7117-69
Hemery C.[7]
Mousley B.
7-636-1
Purcell M.
Soeda G.[4]
6-27-66
Ebden M.[2]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Lee D.[8]
Li Z.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Kwon S.[6]
6-756-47-5
Whittington A.
Imai S.
6-36-3
Ito T.[3]
Ehara H.
6-26-1
R32
Purcell M.
Jung J.
6-43-66-2
Shimizu Y.
Yamasaki J.
6-36-2
Mousley B.
Jasika O.
4-66-46-4
Ehara H.
Takeuchi K.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Takahashi Y.
6-17-66
Li Z.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-2
Hurkacz H.
Uesugi K.
6-36-0
Kwon S.[6]
Krajicek A.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Soeda G.[4]
Leshem E.
7-616-4
Hemery C.[7]
Bolt A.
6-47-64
Whittington A.
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Lee D.[8]
Kibi Y.
6-36-4
Imai S.
Daniel T.[1]
6-37-64
Millman J.[5]
Tashiro Y.
6-36-2
Ito T.[3]
Robert S.
6-35-76-2