Calvin Hemery vs John Millman — Toyota CH Semi-final

Toyota CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
FRA7
Calvin Hemery
#298ATP
1439ELO
1387Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2017
hard
AUS5
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
Hemery C.
7-6 6-7 6-2
Millman J.
Hemery C.
776462
Millman J.
647721

Calvin Hemery defeated John Millman 7-6 6-7 6-2 in the Toyota CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Calvin Hemery closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hemery C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Millman J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hemery C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hemery C.Millman J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hemery C.Millman J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
45
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
95
Break points won·Dominant
3
64
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
70
Tiebreaks·Even
71
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hemery C.Millman J.
Freshness·
69
—

Hemery C.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ebden M.[2]
Hemery C.[7]
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Ebden M.[2]
Hurkacz H.
4-66-47-62
Hemery C.[7]
Millman J.[5]
7-646-746-2
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[5]
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Hemery C.[7]
Whittington A.
3-66-37-5
Hurkacz H.
Ito T.[3]
6-04-0
Ebden M.[2]
Lee D.[8]
6-36-0
R16
Millman J.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-656-7117-69
Hemery C.[7]
Mousley B.
7-636-1
Purcell M.
Soeda G.[4]
6-27-66
Ebden M.[2]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Lee D.[8]
Li Z.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Kwon S.[6]
6-756-47-5
Whittington A.
Imai S.
6-36-3
Ito T.[3]
Ehara H.
6-26-1
R32
Purcell M.
Jung J.
6-43-66-2
Shimizu Y.
Yamasaki J.
6-36-2
Mousley B.
Jasika O.
4-66-46-4
Ehara H.
Takeuchi K.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[2]
Takahashi Y.
6-17-66
Li Z.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-2
Hurkacz H.
Uesugi K.
6-36-0
Kwon S.[6]
Krajicek A.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Soeda G.[4]
Leshem E.
7-616-4
Hemery C.[7]
Bolt A.
6-47-64
Whittington A.
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Lee D.[8]
Kibi Y.
6-36-4
Imai S.
Daniel T.[1]
6-37-64
Millman J.[5]
Tashiro Y.
6-36-2
Ito T.[3]
Robert S.
6-35-76-2