John Patrick Smith vs Marcos Giron — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
John Patrick Smith
37 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2017
hard
Marcos Giron
USA
Marcos Giron
#87ATP
1718ELO
1704Hard ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
Smith J.
6-3 6-1
Giron M.
Smith J.
662
Giron M.
310

John Patrick Smith defeated Marcos Giron 6-3 6-1 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marcos Giron came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Giron M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Smith J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Smith J.Giron M.
—
Serve
29
—
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Smith J.Giron M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.8
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.6
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith J.Giron M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
62
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
98
Break points won·Dominant
6
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Smith J.Giron M.
Freshness·
—
89

Giron M.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Smyczek T.[7]
Fratangelo B.[5]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Fratangelo B.[5]
Fritz T.[3]
3-66-36-2
Smyczek T.[7]
Norrie C.[4]
7-56-756-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[3]
Paul T.[8]
6-13-0
Norrie C.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Smyczek T.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Peliwo F.
4-67-57-64
R16
Norrie C.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-26-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Smith J.
7-57-65
Smyczek T.[7]
Nevolo D.
6-37-64
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
W/O
Paul T.[8]
Ymer M.
6-43-67-60
Fritz T.[3]
Schneider R.
6-46-3
Peliwo F.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-37-5
R32
Laaksonen H.[2]
Moraing M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-26-1
Fritz T.[3]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-1
Schneider R.
Santanna B.
4-66-36-1
Paul T.[8]
Koepfer D.
6-26-4
Smith J.
Giron M.
6-36-1
Hiltzik J.
Krueger M.
3-66-47-62
Norrie C.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Peliwo F.
Eubanks C.
7-53-66-3
Klahn B.
Scholtz N.
6-26-3
Smyczek T.[7]
Ward A.
6-47-64
Fratangelo B.[5]
Fanselow S.
3-67-606-1
Nevolo D.
Monette S.
4-66-46-0
Ymer M.
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Hiltzik A.
6-16-716-0
Harrison C.
Corrie E.
3-66-46-4