Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs David Fleming — Santiago CH Qualifying Round 1

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 13 November 2017
clay
CHI
David Fleming
34 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLL
Ugo Carabelli C.
4-6 6-4 2-0
Fleming D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
462–
Fleming D.
640–

Camilo Ugo Carabelli advanced when David Fleming retired 4-6 6-4 2-0 in the Santiago CH qualifying round 1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fleming D.

Fleming D.serving53% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Serve advantage — Ugo Carabelli C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Fleming D.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Fleming D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
39%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
52%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
32%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Fleming D.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Dellien H.
Dutra Da Silva D.[8]
7-56-2
Varillas J.
Arguello F.
6-26-4
Lindell C.[6]
Gomez E.[2]
6-23-67-5
Clezar G.[1]
Londero J.[5]
6-46-3
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Tabilo A.
7-657-5
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Agamenone F.[7]
7-623-0
Heras P.[4]
Nagy P.[8]
6-46-1
Sakamoto P.[5]
Gonzalez A.[3]
6-25-76-4
Q2
Dutra Da Silva D.[8]
Urzua Rivera R.
6-26-2
Dellien H.
Fleming D.
6-46-2
Varillas J.
Santanna B.[7]
3-67-666-1
Arguello F.
Vernier M.
6-26-4
Lindell C.[6]
Hocevar R.
1-66-36-2
Gomez E.[2]
Rivera Aranguiz G.
6-46-4
Londero J.[5]
Molteni A.
6-46-4
Clezar G.[1]
Montero J.
6-16-0
Sakamoto P.[5]
Nunez V.
6-27-65
Gonzalez A.[3]
Acevedo N.
6-44-66-1
Nagy P.[8]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-47-64
Heras P.[4]
Bruna E.
6-26-4
Tabilo A.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-06-4
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Neis F.
7-647-5
Agamenone F.[7]
Vernier M.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Molteni A.
6-06-2
Q1
Urzua Rivera R.
Bruna N.
6-26-3
Dutra Da Silva D.[8]
Zormann Da Silva M.
6-41-66-3
Fleming D.
Leiva Biason O.
6-36-2
Dellien H.
Sorgi J.[4]
7-637-65
Varillas J.
Kohl C.
6-36-0
Arguello F.
Alvarez Guzman M.
6-26-0
Vernier M.
Lipovsek Puches T.[3]
6-26-1
Lindell C.[6]
Nunez V.
6-16-2
Hocevar R.
Naser J.
4-67-56-3
Rivera Aranguiz G.
Navarro S.
6-16-0
Gomez E.[2]
Luz O.
7-656-4
Londero J.[5]
De Paula F.
6-37-62
Molteni A.
Feitt F.
6-16-4
Montero J.
Abde Celis J.
7-56-3
Clezar G.[1]
Bruna E.
6-26-3
Vernier M.
Urzua Rivera R.
6-41-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Fleming D.
4-66-42-0
Bruna E.
Feitt F.
6-46-2
Nunez V.
Urruticoechea G.
6-17-5
Tabilo A.
Navarro S.
6-36-1
Neis F.
Hudson O.
6-26-3
Molteni A.
Cuevas C.
6-06-1
Acevedo N.
Gelhardt L.
6-27-5