John Patrick Smith vs Tennys Sandgren — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
John Patrick Smith
37 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2017
hard
USA1
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Smith J.
6-4 7-6
Sandgren T.
Smith J.
6772
Sandgren T.
4650

John Patrick Smith defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-4 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. John Patrick Smith claimed a first win over Tennys Sandgren in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-01Great Ocean Road OpenR64hardTennys Sandgren6-3 5-7 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Smith J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Smith J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith J.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith J.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
92
Break points won·Even
6
2
Deciding sets·Slight edge
21
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Peliwo F.
Kudla D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Peliwo F.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-36-0
Kudla D.
Klahn B.
2-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Peliwo F.
Fritz T.[3]
7-676-1
Laaksonen H.[2]
Smyczek T.
7-616-4
Kudla D.
Fratangelo B.[5]
6-13-66-4
Klahn B.
Corrie E.
6-37-63
R16
Kudla D.
Hiltzik J.
6-36-4
Klahn B.
King D.
7-687-5
Peliwo F.
Broady L.
7-634-66-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Moraing M.
6-45-76-2
Fritz T.[3]
Rubin N.
7-656-1
Smyczek T.
Ward A.
6-46-2
Corrie E.
Smith J.
6-45-77-5
Laaksonen H.[2]
Schnur B.
6-47-5
R32
Kudla D.
Norrie C.[4]
6-43-66-3
Fritz T.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-46-3
Moraing M.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Smith J.
Sandgren T.[1]
6-47-65
Fratangelo B.[5]
Krueger M.
6-47-5
Schnur B.
Giron M.
6-46-3
Smyczek T.
Kozlov S.[6]
7-636-2
Rubin N.
Koepfer D.
7-56-3
Peliwo F.
Paul T.[8]
6-47-5
Hiltzik J.
Opelka R.
6-776-46-1
Klahn B.
Mmoh M.[7]
1-66-46-4
King D.
Nielsen F.
6-47-62
Corrie E.
King K.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[2]
Stodder T.
6-46-4
Ward A.
Schneider R.
6-37-5
Broady L.
Valero L.
6-06-3