Filip Peliwo vs Tommy Paul — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#479ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2017
hard
Tommy Paul
USA8
Tommy Paul
#25ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Peliwo F.
6-4 7-5
Paul T.
Peliwo F.
672
Paul T.
450

Filip Peliwo defeated Tommy Paul 6-4 7-5 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tommy Paul came in ranked #25.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peliwo F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Paul T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Peliwo F.Paul T.
—
Serve
71
—
Return
54

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Peliwo F.Paul T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peliwo F.Paul T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
93
Break points saved·Dominant
23
99
Break points won·Dominant
11
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Peliwo F.Paul T.
Freshness·
—
88

Paul T.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Peliwo F.
Kudla D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Peliwo F.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-36-0
Kudla D.
Klahn B.
2-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Peliwo F.
Fritz T.[3]
7-676-1
Laaksonen H.[2]
Smyczek T.
7-616-4
Kudla D.
Fratangelo B.[5]
6-13-66-4
Klahn B.
Corrie E.
6-37-63
R16
Kudla D.
Hiltzik J.
6-36-4
Klahn B.
King D.
7-687-5
Peliwo F.
Broady L.
7-634-66-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Moraing M.
6-45-76-2
Fritz T.[3]
Rubin N.
7-656-1
Smyczek T.
Ward A.
6-46-2
Corrie E.
Smith J.
6-45-77-5
Laaksonen H.[2]
Schnur B.
6-47-5
R32
Kudla D.
Norrie C.[4]
6-43-66-3
Fritz T.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-46-3
Moraing M.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Smith J.
Sandgren T.[1]
6-47-65
Fratangelo B.[5]
Krueger M.
6-47-5
Schnur B.
Giron M.
6-46-3
Smyczek T.
Kozlov S.[6]
7-636-2
Rubin N.
Koepfer D.
7-56-3
Peliwo F.
Paul T.[8]
6-47-5
Hiltzik J.
Opelka R.
6-776-46-1
Klahn B.
Mmoh M.[7]
1-66-46-4
King D.
Nielsen F.
6-47-62
Corrie E.
King K.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[2]
Stodder T.
6-46-4
Ward A.
Schneider R.
6-37-5
Broady L.
Valero L.
6-06-3