Yibing Wu vs Zhe Li — Shenzhen CH Round of 16

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yibing Wu
CHN
Yibing Wu
#106ATP
1743ELO
1741Hard ELO
$472kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2017
hard
CHN
Zhe Li
#1964ATP
39 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWW
Wu Y.
6-1 6-2
Li Z.
Wu Y.
662
Li Z.
120

Yibing Wu defeated Zhe Li 6-1 6-2 in the Shenzhen CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yibing Wu came in ranked #106, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Yibing Wu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-08Shanghai MastersR64hardYibing Wu7-6(5) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Wu Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Li Z.

Li Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wu Y.Li Z.
28
Serve
—
29
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wu Y.Li Z.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu Y.Li Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
23
Break points saved·Dominant
94
58
Break points won·Dominant
57
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wu Y.Li Z.
Freshness·
67
—

Wu Y.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sugita Y.[2]
Kavcic B.[6]
7-666-4
Albot R.[3]
Hurkacz H.
7-666-736-4
Semi-finals
Sugita Y.[2]
Bhambri Y.
4-66-46-3
Kavcic B.[6]
Vanni L.[5]
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Kavcic B.[2]
7-617-5
Albot R.[3]
Youzhny M.[1]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Vanni L.[5]
Lee D.[4]
6-16-3
Sugita Y.[2]
Fabbiano T.[8]
6-26-4
Bhambri Y.
Marterer M.[7]
6-33-67-5
Kavcic B.[6]
Donskoy E.[1]
2-67-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Youzhny M.[1]
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Albot R.[3]
Jung J.
5-76-37-5
Kavcic B.[2]
Wu Y.
7-613-66-2
R16
Sugita Y.[2]
Satral J.
6-756-36-2
Fabbiano T.[8]
Skugor F.
6-46-4
Bhambri Y.
Milojevic N.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[7]
Ignatik U.
4-66-47-66
Vanni L.[5]
Bai Y.
6-16-2
Lee D.[4]
Hurkacz H.
6-32-67-65
Kavcic B.[6]
Wang C.
6-16-2
Donskoy E.[1]
Nedovyesov A.
6-26-4
Wu Y.
Li Z.
6-16-2
Hurkacz H.
Safwat M.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Santillan A.[6]
6-21-66-3
Albot R.[3]
Petrovic D.
3-66-36-3
Krajicek A.
Lee D.[9]
7-53-66-3
Youzhny M.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-26-4
Kwon S.
Polansky P.[4]
6-746-34-0
Kavcic B.[2]
Robert S.
6-36-2
R32
Sugita Y.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-26-2
Satral J.
Michon A.
6-16-2
Skugor F.
Velotti A.
6-06-1
Fabbiano T.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Milojevic N.
Carballes Baena R.[3]
4-66-47-5
Bhambri Y.
Napolitano S.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-2
Bai Y.
Zheng W.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Wu D.
6-36-3
Lee D.[4]
Ito T.
6-15-76-4
Kavcic B.[6]
Djere L.
6-36-1
Wang C.
Diez S.
3-66-46-3
Nedovyesov A.
Sousa P.
6-46-0
Donskoy E.[1]
Ivashka I.
3-66-37-60
Ignatik U.
Uchiyama Y.
5-2
Marterer M.[7]
Safiullin R.
7-696-3
Lee D.[9]
Nakagawa N.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Monteiro T.[5]
6-36-4
Kwon S.
Zhang Z.
3-66-37-5
Safwat M.
Gabashvili T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[6]
Doumbia S.
7-666-2
Jung J.
Matosevic M.
6-47-64
Albot R.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-1
Krajicek A.
Wang C.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Niesten M.
6-06-4
Youzhny M.[1]
Moriya H.
6-16-3
Robert S.
Wu D.
2-67-666-1
Li Z.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Petrovic D.
Kecmanovic M.
2-66-16-4
Kavcic B.[2]
Te R.
6-46-3
Polansky P.[4]
Ghedin R.
6-46-3
Hurkacz H.
Hemery C.[8]
7-646-3