Mikhail Youzhny vs Sumit Nagal — Ho Chi Minh City CH Round of 32

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS2
Mikhail Youzhny
44 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 October 2017
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Youzhny M.
6-1 6-7 6-4
Nagal S.
Youzhny M.
66562
Nagal S.
17741

Mikhail Youzhny defeated Sumit Nagal 6-1 6-7 6-4 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikhail Youzhny came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Youzhny M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Youzhny M.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Youzhny M.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Youzhny M.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
69
Break points won·Slight edge
41
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
16
Tiebreaks·Even
83
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Youzhny M.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[2]
Millman J.[8]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Millman J.[8]
Soeda G.[5]
7-653-67-5
Youzhny M.[2]
Santillan A.[6]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Jung J.
6-36-2
Santillan A.[6]
Polansky P.[3]
6-33-66-4
Millman J.[8]
Bhambri Y.[4]
3-66-37-62
Soeda G.[5]
Fritz T.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Soeda G.[5]
Safwat M.
6-746-27-65
Youzhny M.[2]
Matosevic M.
6-16-1
Millman J.[8]
Escoffier A.
6-16-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Chen T.
6-36-1
Fritz T.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Jung J.
Grenier H.
7-656-3
Santillan A.[6]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-0
Polansky P.[3]
Robert S.
7-56-786-4
R32
Youzhny M.[2]
Nagal S.
6-16-756-4
Matosevic M.
Trinh L.
4-66-06-2
Polansky P.[3]
Bega A.
6-44-67-5
Robert S.
Pham M.
7-56-3
Watanuki Y.
Khabibulin T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[6]
Myneni S.
6-46-2
Millman J.[8]
Purcell M.
6-16-3
Bhambri Y.[4]
Statham J.
6-16-4
Soeda G.[5]
Ly N.
6-46-1
Safwat M.
Paul J.
7-52-66-3
Gunneswaran P.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Fritz T.[1]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-26-4
Chen T.
Ursu V.
6-12-66-2
Grenier H.
Popko D.[7]
7-666-2
Jung J.
Mladenov V.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Baltensperger R.
3-66-17-5