Go Soeda vs Taylor Fritz — Ho Chi Minh City CH Quarter-final

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN5
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 October 2017
hard
Taylor Fritz
USA1
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Soeda G.
6-3 7-5
Fritz T.
Soeda G.
672
Fritz T.
350

Go Soeda defeated Taylor Fritz 6-3 7-5 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Go Soeda closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Soeda G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Fritz T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Soeda G.Fritz T.
—
Serve
76
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Soeda G.Fritz T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
70%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
11.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Soeda G.Fritz T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
87
Break points saved·Dominant
61
100
Break points won·Dominant
14
60
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Soeda G.Fritz T.
Freshness·
—
76

Fritz T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[2]
Millman J.[8]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Millman J.[8]
Soeda G.[5]
7-653-67-5
Youzhny M.[2]
Santillan A.[6]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Jung J.
6-36-2
Santillan A.[6]
Polansky P.[3]
6-33-66-4
Millman J.[8]
Bhambri Y.[4]
3-66-37-62
Soeda G.[5]
Fritz T.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Soeda G.[5]
Safwat M.
6-746-27-65
Youzhny M.[2]
Matosevic M.
6-16-1
Millman J.[8]
Escoffier A.
6-16-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Chen T.
6-36-1
Fritz T.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Jung J.
Grenier H.
7-656-3
Santillan A.[6]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-0
Polansky P.[3]
Robert S.
7-56-786-4
R32
Youzhny M.[2]
Nagal S.
6-16-756-4
Matosevic M.
Trinh L.
4-66-06-2
Polansky P.[3]
Bega A.
6-44-67-5
Robert S.
Pham M.
7-56-3
Watanuki Y.
Khabibulin T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[6]
Myneni S.
6-46-2
Millman J.[8]
Purcell M.
6-16-3
Bhambri Y.[4]
Statham J.
6-16-4
Soeda G.[5]
Ly N.
6-46-1
Safwat M.
Paul J.
7-52-66-3
Gunneswaran P.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Fritz T.[1]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-26-4
Chen T.
Ursu V.
6-12-66-2
Grenier H.
Popko D.[7]
7-666-2
Jung J.
Mladenov V.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Baltensperger R.
3-66-17-5