Ti Chen vs Vadym Ursu — Ho Chi Minh City CH Round of 32

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TPE
Ti Chen
42 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 October 2017
hard
UKR
Vadym Ursu
#415ATP
1223ELO
1196Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Chen T.
6-1 2-6 6-2
Ursu V.
Chen T.
6262
Ursu V.
1621

Ti Chen defeated Vadym Ursu 6-1 2-6 6-2 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ti Chen closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chen T.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ursu V.

Ursu V.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Chen T.

Serve advantage — Ursu V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chen T.Ursu V.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
42%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chen T.Ursu V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
14
0
Break points saved·Dominant
39
8
Break points won·Even
18
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
39
27
Tiebreaks·
32
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Chen T.Ursu V.
Freshness·
—
100

Ursu V.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[2]
Millman J.[8]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Millman J.[8]
Soeda G.[5]
7-653-67-5
Youzhny M.[2]
Santillan A.[6]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Youzhny M.[2]
Jung J.
6-36-2
Santillan A.[6]
Polansky P.[3]
6-33-66-4
Millman J.[8]
Bhambri Y.[4]
3-66-37-62
Soeda G.[5]
Fritz T.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Soeda G.[5]
Safwat M.
6-746-27-65
Youzhny M.[2]
Matosevic M.
6-16-1
Millman J.[8]
Escoffier A.
6-16-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Chen T.
6-36-1
Fritz T.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Jung J.
Grenier H.
7-656-3
Santillan A.[6]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-0
Polansky P.[3]
Robert S.
7-56-786-4
R32
Youzhny M.[2]
Nagal S.
6-16-756-4
Matosevic M.
Trinh L.
4-66-06-2
Polansky P.[3]
Bega A.
6-44-67-5
Robert S.
Pham M.
7-56-3
Watanuki Y.
Khabibulin T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[6]
Myneni S.
6-46-2
Millman J.[8]
Purcell M.
6-16-3
Bhambri Y.[4]
Statham J.
6-16-4
Soeda G.[5]
Ly N.
6-46-1
Safwat M.
Paul J.
7-52-66-3
Gunneswaran P.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Fritz T.[1]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-26-4
Chen T.
Ursu V.
6-12-66-2
Grenier H.
Popko D.[7]
7-666-2
Jung J.
Mladenov V.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Baltensperger R.
3-66-17-5