Blaz Rola vs Facundo Arguello — Lima CH Qualifying Final

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
SLO2
Blaz Rola
35 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 October 2017
clay
ARG7
Facundo Arguello
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWWW
Rola B.
6-2 6-2
Arguello F.
Rola B.
662
Arguello F.
220

Blaz Rola defeated Facundo Arguello 6-2 6-2 in the Lima CH qualifying final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Arguello came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Blaz Rola had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on clay. Blaz Rola claimed a first win over Facundo Arguello in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-15Rio de JaneiroQ1clayFacundo Arguello3-6 6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Rola B.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Arguello F.

Arguello F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rola B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rola B.Arguello F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rola B.Arguello F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
17
6
Break points saved·Dominant
81
34
Break points won·Clear edge
5
24
Deciding sets·Even
6
10
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
51
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q3
Rola B.[2]
Arguello F.[7]
6-26-2
Kuzmanov D.
Londero J.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[8]
Agamenone F.
4-66-46-3
Hernandez J.
Linzer M.[5]
6-746-16-0
Q2
Linzer M.[5]
Kestelboim M.
6-06-1
Rola B.[2]
Gomez Herrera C.
5-77-656-4
Hernandez J.
Cachin P.
6-25-76-4
Kuzmanov D.
Zeballos F.
6-26-1
Arguello F.[7]
Hampel L.
4-66-46-1
Londero J.
Sorgi J.[6]
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[8]
Paz J.
6-16-4
Agamenone F.
Galan D.[3]
6-36-2
Q1
Hernandez J.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-1
Linzer M.[5]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-2
Zeballos F.
Panta Herreros J.
7-657-65
Sorgi J.[6]
Mena F.
7-626-0
Kuzmanov D.
Dellien H.[4]
6-27-65
Agamenone F.
Rodriguez C.
6-27-5
Galan D.[3]
Ficovich J.
5-76-36-2
Hampel L.
Marcora R.
6-47-65
Rola B.[2]
Cuevas M.
6-36-1
Kestelboim M.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Cachin P.
Coria F.[1]
6-16-3