Pauline Parmentier vs Monica Niculescu — Luxembourg Round of 32

Luxembourg · WTA · Round of 32
FRA
Pauline Parmentier
40 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2017
hard
ROU
Monica Niculescu
38 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Parmentier P.
7-5 6-3
Niculescu M.
Parmentier P.
762
Niculescu M.
530

Pauline Parmentier defeated Monica Niculescu 7-5 6-3 in the Luxembourg round of 32 on hard. Pauline Parmentier extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-05-23Roland GarrosR128clayPauline Parmentier6-2 7-6(2)
2012-01-16Australian OpenR64hardMonica Niculescu4-6 6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Parmentier P.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Niculescu M.

Niculescu M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Parmentier P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Parmentier P.Niculescu M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
59%
78%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
56%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
54%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
0.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Parmentier P.Niculescu M.
Clutch Rating·Even
15
12
Break points saved·Dominant
39
14
Break points won·Dominant
41
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
25
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Witthoeft C.
Puig M.
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Puig M.
Mertens E.[5]
6-27-5
Witthoeft C.
Parmentier P.
7-621-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[5]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Puig M.
Broady N.
6-05-76-1
Parmentier P.
Larsson J.
6-16-2
Witthoeft C.
Bertens K.[2]
6-16-2
R16
Bertens K.[2]
Petkovic A.
6-22-1
Puig M.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-627-61
Larsson J.
Haddad Maia B.[7]
3-67-656-2
Broady N.
Lisicki S.
4-67-56-3
Mertens E.[5]
Brengle M.
6-20-66-3
Witthoeft C.
Rodina E.
6-26-3
Parmentier P.
Cepede Royg V.
7-56-1
Watson H.
Kontaveit A.[3]
6-46-4
R32
Brengle M.
Arruabarrena L.
6-26-2
Parmentier P.
Niculescu M.
7-56-3
Cepede Royg V.
Cirstea S.[4]
7-53-2
Lisicki S.
Buzarnescu M.
7-637-64
Puig M.
Kerber A.[1]
6-36-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-4
Petkovic A.
Martic P.
6-13-67-65
Broady N.
Maria T.[6]
6-26-2
Mertens E.[5]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-06-2
Watson H.
Wickmayer Y.
6-26-1
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Flipkens K.
6-36-4
Larsson J.
Bouchard E.
2-66-26-3
Bertens K.[2]
Allertova D.
6-47-5
Kontaveit A.[3]
Cepelova J.
6-06-2
Rodina E.
Fett J.
7-56-3
Witthoeft C.
Lepchenko V.[8]
7-612-67-61