Jordan Thompson vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras — Ningbo CH Round of 16

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS2
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2017
hard
ESP
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Thompson J.
6-3 6-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Thompson J.
662
Menendez Maceiras A.
340

Jordan Thompson defeated Adrian Menendez Maceiras 6-3 6-4 in the Ningbo CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-05-01IstanbulR32clayJordan Thompson6-7(4) 6-0 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Menendez Maceiras A.

Menendez Maceiras A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Menendez Maceiras A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Menendez Maceiras A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
21
Break points saved·Dominant
97
54
Break points won·Clear edge
24
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
32
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Youzhny M.[7]
Daniel T.[6]
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Youzhny M.[7]
Rodionov J.
6-36-4
Daniel T.[6]
Lu Y.[1]
5-2
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Thompson J.[2]
3-67-656-4
Daniel T.[6]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-726-3
Lu Y.[1]
Polansky P.[8]
6-26-3
Youzhny M.[7]
Li Z.
6-36-1
R16
Rodionov J.
Chung Y.
W/O
Daniel T.[6]
Matosevic M.
6-46-4
Thompson J.[2]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4
Watanuki Y.
Wu D.
6-36-3
Polansky P.[8]
Monteiro T.
3-67-686-4
Li Z.
Lee D.
6-26-4
Youzhny M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-4
Lu Y.[1]
Ito T.
6-26-3
R32
Moriya H.
Hemery C.
6-36-2
Li Z.
Jung J.
7-666-2
Thompson J.[2]
Statham J.
6-46-2
Chung Y.
Jarry N.[5]
7-656-3
Watanuki Y.
Kecmanovic M.
4-66-27-65
Polansky P.[8]
Sun F.
6-27-63
Lu Y.[1]
Soeda G.
6-34-66-4
Monteiro T.
Zhang Z.
4-67-646-4
Rodionov J.
Wu Y.
6-46-3
Matosevic M.
Nagal S.
6-26-4
Lee D.
Fritz T.[3]
6-33-66-3
Ito T.
Te R.
6-37-5
Daniel T.[6]
Gao X.
6-26-4
Youzhny M.[7]
Takahashi Y.
6-27-5
Wu D.
Albot R.[4]
6-46-3
Menendez Maceiras A.
Doumbia S.
3-66-26-1