Juan Ignacio Londero vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Cali CH Qualifying Round 1

Cali CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ARG
Juan Ignacio Londero
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2017
clay
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Londero J.
6-3 6-3
Ficovich J.
Londero J.
662
Ficovich J.
330

Juan Ignacio Londero defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-3 6-3 in the Cali CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Ignacio Londero came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Londero J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Londero J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Londero J.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Londero J.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
27
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
76
Break points won·Clear edge
30
9
Deciding sets·Even
23
27
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Londero J.Ficovich J.
Freshness·
—
86

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Vilella Martinez M.[7]
Dellien H.[1]
7-57-5
Lama G.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-2
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Gomez Herrera C.[5]
3-67-636-2
Londero J.
Hampel L.
3-66-36-2
Q2
Lama G.
Panfil G.
6-46-2
Hampel L.
Benitez Chavarriaga J.
6-44-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Salamanca C.
6-26-4
Barrios Vera T.
Mena F.[4]
6-16-1
Gomez Herrera C.[5]
Sakamoto P.
6-37-5
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Hernandez Ramirez S.
6-16-1
Londero J.
Quiroz R.[2]
6-36-4
Vilella Martinez M.[7]
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-4
Q1
Lama G.
Giner M.[6]
6-36-3
Panfil G.
Matos D.
6-06-0
Mena F.[4]
Gomez J.
6-46-4
Gomez Herrera C.[5]
Mantilla F.
6-27-62
Hernandez Ramirez S.
Quintero M.
6-20-0
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Endara I.
6-12-0
Hampel L.
Paz J.[8]
6-46-3
Benitez Chavarriaga J.
Mora D.
6-26-3
Londero J.
Ficovich J.
6-36-3
Vilella Martinez M.[7]
Smith R.
6-26-0
Salamanca C.
Lopez J.
6-07-62