Naomi Broady vs Tatjana Maria — Luxembourg Round of 32

Luxembourg · WTA · Round of 32
GBR
Naomi Broady
36 yrs · 189 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2017
hard
Tatjana Maria
GER6
Tatjana Maria
#76WTA
1703ELO
1608Hard ELO
38 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Broady N.
6-2 6-2
Maria T.
Broady N.
662
Maria T.
220

Naomi Broady defeated Tatjana Maria 6-2 6-2 in the Luxembourg round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broady N.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Maria T.

Maria T.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Broady N.

Serve advantage — Maria T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Broady N.Maria T.
—
Serve
9
—
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Broady N.Maria T.
1st serve in·Even
56%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
50%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broady N.Maria T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
3
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
50
31
Break points won·Dominant
32
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
26
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Broady N.Maria T.
Freshness·
—
64

Maria T.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 81 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Witthoeft C.
Puig M.
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Puig M.
Mertens E.[5]
6-27-5
Witthoeft C.
Parmentier P.
7-621-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[5]
Watson H.
6-46-4
Puig M.
Broady N.
6-05-76-1
Parmentier P.
Larsson J.
6-16-2
Witthoeft C.
Bertens K.[2]
6-16-2
R16
Bertens K.[2]
Petkovic A.
6-22-1
Puig M.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-627-61
Larsson J.
Haddad Maia B.[7]
3-67-656-2
Broady N.
Lisicki S.
4-67-56-3
Mertens E.[5]
Brengle M.
6-20-66-3
Witthoeft C.
Rodina E.
6-26-3
Parmentier P.
Cepede Royg V.
7-56-1
Watson H.
Kontaveit A.[3]
6-46-4
R32
Brengle M.
Arruabarrena L.
6-26-2
Parmentier P.
Niculescu M.
7-56-3
Cepede Royg V.
Cirstea S.[4]
7-53-2
Lisicki S.
Buzarnescu M.
7-637-64
Puig M.
Kerber A.[1]
6-36-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-4
Petkovic A.
Martic P.
6-13-67-65
Broady N.
Maria T.[6]
6-26-2
Mertens E.[5]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-06-2
Watson H.
Wickmayer Y.
6-26-1
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Flipkens K.
6-36-4
Larsson J.
Bouchard E.
2-66-26-3
Bertens K.[2]
Allertova D.
6-47-5
Kontaveit A.[3]
Cepelova J.
6-06-2
Rodina E.
Fett J.
7-56-3
Witthoeft C.
Lepchenko V.[8]
7-612-67-61