Steve Johnson vs Nick Kyrgios — Shanghai Masters Round of 64

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
USA
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 9 October 2017
hard
AUS13
Nick Kyrgios
#899ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Johnson S.
7-6 0-0
Kyrgios N.
Johnson S.
770–
Kyrgios N.
650–

Steve Johnson advanced when Nick Kyrgios retired 7-6 0-0 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64. Steve Johnson claimed a first win over Nick Kyrgios in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-26US OpenR128hardNick Kyrgios6-3 7-6(1) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Johnson S.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Kyrgios N.

Kyrgios N.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johnson S.Kyrgios N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Even
34%
32%
Break points saved·Even
64%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
16.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johnson S.Kyrgios N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
88
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
10
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
97
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
28°CDrizzle
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 68%
Final
Federer R.[2]
Nadal R.[1]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Federer R.[2]
del Potro J.[16]
3-66-36-3
Nadal R.[1]
Cilic M.[4]
7-57-63
Quarter-finals
Federer R.[2]
Gasquet R.
7-56-4
del Potro J.[16]
Troicki V.
4-66-16-4
Cilic M.[4]
Ramos A.
6-36-4
Nadal R.[1]
Dimitrov G.[6]
6-46-746-3
R16
Federer R.[2]
Dolgopolov A.
6-46-2
Gasquet R.
Simon G.
7-56-756-3
del Potro J.[16]
Zverev A.[3]
3-67-656-4
Troicki V.
Isner J.[12]
6-47-64
Cilic M.[4]
Johnson S.
7-616-4
Dimitrov G.[6]
Querrey S.[10]
6-37-63
Nadal R.[1]
Fognini F.
6-36-1
Ramos A.
Struff J.
7-646-4
R32
Isner J.[12]
Tsitsipas S.
7-627-69
Dimitrov G.[6]
Harrison R.
3-66-37-66
Federer R.[2]
Schwartzman D.
7-646-4
Dolgopolov A.
Lopez F.
7-641-66-4
Gasquet R.
Chung H.
3-66-46-3
Simon G.
Goffin D.[8]
7-646-3
del Potro J.[16]
Rublev A.
6-36-4
Troicki V.
Thiem D.[5]
6-33-67-65
Ramos A.
Carreno Busta P.[7]
7-57-5
Cilic M.[4]
Edmund K.
6-37-65
Querrey S.[10]
Tiafoe F.
6-37-67
Fognini F.
Pouille L.[15]
7-676-3
Nadal R.[1]
Donaldson J.
6-26-1
Johnson S.
Wu D.
6-26-1
Zverev A.[3]
Bedene A.
4-0
Struff J.
Anderson K.[11]
7-657-62
R64
Schwartzman D.
Thompson J.
6-47-64
Chung H.
Bautista Agut R.[9]
6-46-3
Gasquet R.
Haase R.
6-7117-56-2
Simon G.
Wu Y.
6-36-4
Bedene A.
Lorenzi P.
6-16-4
Rublev A.
Dzumhur D.
6-14-66-1
del Potro J.[16]
Basilashvili N.
6-23-66-4
Tsitsipas S.
Khachanov K.
7-56-3
Troicki V.
Shapovalov D.
6-736-36-0
Ramos A.
Sousa J.
3-66-37-5
Anderson K.[11]
Mannarino A.
6-36-1
Wu D.
Chardy J.
7-626-2
Edmund K.
Vesely J.
6-36-2
Harrison R.
Zhang Z.
6-26-3
Tiafoe F.
Paire B.
6-46-4
Querrey S.[10]
Sugita Y.
6-36-2
Pouille L.[15]
Medvedev D.
6-46-2
Fognini F.
Verdasco F.
2-66-46-2
Donaldson J.
Cuevas P.
6-776-46-4
Lopez F.
Karlovic I.
7-617-66
Dolgopolov A.
Sock J.[14]
4-66-12-1
Struff J.
Zverev M.
3-66-5
Johnson S.
Kyrgios N.[13]
7-650-0
Isner J.[12]
Lajovic D.
4-67-657-66