Bradley Klahn vs Ernesto Escobedo — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Bradley Klahn
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2017
hard
MEX1
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Klahn B.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Escobedo E.
Klahn B.
66762
Escobedo E.
47931

Bradley Klahn defeated Ernesto Escobedo 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ernesto Escobedo came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Bradley Klahn claimed a first win over Ernesto Escobedo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Bradley Klahn closed it out in three sets, 6–4 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-19San DiegoQ1hardErnesto Escobedo3-6 7-6(6) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Klahn B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Klahn B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Klahn B.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Klahn B.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
35
28
Break points saved·Even
88
84
Break points won·Slight edge
6
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
27
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
83
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Mcdonald M.
Klahn B.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Mcdonald M.
Oconnell C.
6-47-5
Klahn B.
Marterer M.[4]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.
Fratangelo B.[3]
7-655-76-4
Klahn B.
Milojevic N.[8]
4-66-36-4
Marterer M.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-47-5
Mcdonald M.
Sandgren T.[2]
7-636-2
R16
Fratangelo B.[3]
Gonzalez A.
7-657-65
Sandgren T.[2]
Rubin N.
7-616-3
Oconnell C.
Kamke T.
0-66-36-4
Marterer M.[4]
Bangoura S.
6-36-2
Milojevic N.[8]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.
King D.
6-36-1
Fanselow S.
Mmoh M.[9]
7-627-65
Klahn B.
Escobedo E.[1]
6-46-776-3
R32
King D.
Dancevic F.
6-46-4
Gonzalez A.
Smith J.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.[2]
Krueger M.
6-36-727-65
Rubin N.
Groth S.
6-43-67-5
Mcdonald M.
Kozlov S.[6]
6-45-76-1
Fratangelo B.[3]
Ward A.
3-67-656-4
Fanselow S.
Geller A.
6-26-4
Marterer M.[4]
Klein B.
6-47-62
Milojevic N.[8]
Schnur B.
6-17-5
Auger Aliassime F.
Satral J.
4-66-36-4
Bangoura S.
Roelofse R.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.[1]
Sarkissian A.
5-76-06-2
Klahn B.
King K.
1-66-16-1
Kamke T.
Ramanathan R.[7]
6-44-66-4
Mmoh M.[9]
King E.
6-14-67-65
Oconnell C.
Kudla D.
7-56-3