Evgeny Donskoy vs Lukas Lacko — Kaohsiung CH Quarter-final

Kaohsiung CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
RUS4
Evgeny Donskoy
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2017
hard
SVK5
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Donskoy E.
6-2 6-4
Lacko L.
Donskoy E.
662
Lacko L.
240

Evgeny Donskoy defeated Lukas Lacko 6-2 6-4 in the Kaohsiung CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Lacko came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, but Evgeny Donskoy had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on hard. Evgeny Donskoy claimed a first win over Lukas Lacko in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-05SofiaR32hardLukas Lacko6-4 6-4
2014-09-22ShenzhenR32hardLukas Lacko6-1 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Donskoy E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Donskoy E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Donskoy E.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Donskoy E.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Even
25
26
Break points saved·Even
89
86
Break points won·Even
5
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
10
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
65
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Donskoy E.[4]
Copil M.[3]
7-607-5
Semi-finals
Donskoy E.[4]
Harris L.
6-36-3
Copil M.[3]
Matosevic M.
6-27-65
Quarter-finals
Harris L.
Millman J.
7-646-3
Matosevic M.
Begemann A.
6-16-3
Copil M.[3]
Rosol L.
7-666-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Lacko L.[5]
6-26-4
R16
Harris L.
Purcell M.
6-737-657-64
Donskoy E.[4]
Jung J.
6-17-64
Matosevic M.
Saville L.
6-787-626-1
Begemann A.
Yang T.
3-66-16-4
Rosol L.
Santillan A.[8]
6-46-757-5
Lacko L.[5]
Bai Y.
7-56-2
Millman J.
Moriya H.
6-13-66-3
Copil M.[3]
Bachinger M.
6-43-66-3
R32
Yang T.
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Lee D.
3-66-27-61
Moriya H.
Polmans M.
6-26-4
Harris L.
Wu T.
6-47-64
Millman J.
Bhambri Y.[7]
6-36-3
Donskoy E.[4]
Kibi Y.
6-26-4
Bai Y.
Kim C.
6-46-4
Lacko L.[5]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Santillan A.[8]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Sela D.[2]
6-40-66-3
Bachinger M.
Gabashvili T.
6-07-65
Saville L.
Youzhny M.[6]
1-67-626-1
Matosevic M.
Hsu Y.
6-16-2
Copil M.[3]
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Begemann A.
Thompson J.[1]
7-636-3
Rosol L.
Chiudinelli M.
6-07-63