Marius Copil vs Sumit Nagal — Kaohsiung CH Round of 32

Kaohsiung CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU3
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2017
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Copil M.
6-4 6-2
Nagal S.
Copil M.
662
Nagal S.
420

Marius Copil defeated Sumit Nagal 6-4 6-2 in the Kaohsiung CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Dominant
3
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Copil M.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Donskoy E.[4]
Copil M.[3]
7-607-5
Semi-finals
Donskoy E.[4]
Harris L.
6-36-3
Copil M.[3]
Matosevic M.
6-27-65
Quarter-finals
Harris L.
Millman J.
7-646-3
Matosevic M.
Begemann A.
6-16-3
Copil M.[3]
Rosol L.
7-666-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Lacko L.[5]
6-26-4
R16
Harris L.
Purcell M.
6-737-657-64
Donskoy E.[4]
Jung J.
6-17-64
Matosevic M.
Saville L.
6-787-626-1
Begemann A.
Yang T.
3-66-16-4
Rosol L.
Santillan A.[8]
6-46-757-5
Lacko L.[5]
Bai Y.
7-56-2
Millman J.
Moriya H.
6-13-66-3
Copil M.[3]
Bachinger M.
6-43-66-3
R32
Yang T.
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Lee D.
3-66-27-61
Moriya H.
Polmans M.
6-26-4
Harris L.
Wu T.
6-47-64
Millman J.
Bhambri Y.[7]
6-36-3
Donskoy E.[4]
Kibi Y.
6-26-4
Bai Y.
Kim C.
6-46-4
Lacko L.[5]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Santillan A.[8]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Purcell M.
Sela D.[2]
6-40-66-3
Bachinger M.
Gabashvili T.
6-07-65
Saville L.
Youzhny M.[6]
1-67-626-1
Matosevic M.
Hsu Y.
6-16-2
Copil M.[3]
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Begemann A.
Thompson J.[1]
7-636-3
Rosol L.
Chiudinelli M.
6-07-63