Elias Ymer vs Ruben Bemelmans — Stockton CH Round of 32

Stockton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2017
hard
BEL1
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Ymer E.
7-5 6-3
Bemelmans R.
Ymer E.
762
Bemelmans R.
530

Elias Ymer defeated Ruben Bemelmans 7-5 6-3 in the Stockton CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ruben Bemelmans came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Elias Ymer claimed a first win over Ruben Bemelmans in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Elias Ymer closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-01WimbledonQ1grassRuben Bemelmans6-3 6-7(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Bemelmans R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Bemelmans R.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Bemelmans R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
16
Break points saved·Even
83
87
Break points won·Clear edge
23
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Bemelmans R.
Freshness·
100
—

Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Norrie C.[8]
King D.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Norrie C.[8]
Mmoh M.[3]
7-56-2
King D.[6]
Smyczek T.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Norrie C.[8]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-37-65
Smyczek T.
Ymer E.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Tursunov D.
6-30-0
King D.[6]
Kozlov S.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Sandgren T.[2]
Broady L.
7-676-4
Norrie C.[8]
Klein B.
4-67-616-4
Tursunov D.
Smith J.
7-626-3
King D.[6]
Rubin N.
2-66-16-2
Smyczek T.
Harrison C.
2-66-36-4
Ymer E.
Dancevic F.
3-67-686-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Mcdonald M.
1-66-27-64
Kozlov S.[4]
Kudla D.
6-46-4
R32
Ymer E.
Bemelmans R.[1]
7-56-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Oconnell C.
7-57-5
Broady L.
Krueger M.
7-676-1
Klein B.
Satral J.
6-26-2
Mmoh M.[3]
Kamke T.
6-26-1
Rubin N.
El Sallaly A.
6-26-3
Kudla D.
Choinski J.
6-06-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Harrison C.
Ramanathan R.[5]
6-16-2
Smyczek T.
Nielsen F.
6-27-5
Tursunov D.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Goransson A.
6-24-66-2
King D.[6]
Ward A.
7-57-62
Smith J.
Peliwo F.
6-26-3
Dancevic F.
Bangoura S.
6-46-0
Norrie C.[8]
Baughman D.
6-36-1