Tennys Sandgren vs Brayden Schnur — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA2
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2017
hard
CAN
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
Sandgren T.
6-1 7-6
Schnur B.
Sandgren T.
6772
Schnur B.
1650

Tennys Sandgren defeated Brayden Schnur 6-1 7-6 in the Tiburon CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Schnur B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Schnur B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.6
7.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Schnur B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
36
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
86
Break points won·Even
2
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
14
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Norrie C.[8]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Norrie C.[8]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-2
Sandgren T.[2]
Mcdonald M.
7-647-63
Quarter-finals
Mcdonald M.
Gonzalez A.
6-43-66-1
Gunneswaran P.
Dancevic F.
4-66-46-4
Norrie C.[8]
Mmoh M.[4]
7-56-2
Sandgren T.[2]
Harrison C.
6-16-2
R16
Norrie C.[8]
Krueger M.
4-66-26-2
Mmoh M.[4]
Kamke T.
6-32-67-67
Harrison C.
Choinski J.
6-47-65
Mcdonald M.
Kudla D.
7-666-2
Gunneswaran P.
Baughman D.
7-656-4
Dancevic F.
Fawcett T.
6-36-4
Gonzalez A.
Halys Q.[3]
6-46-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Schnur B.
6-17-65
R32
Baughman D.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-26-2
Halys Q.[3]
Peliwo F.
2-66-16-2
Sandgren T.[2]
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Schnur B.
Montgomery W.
6-36-3
Harrison C.
Uchida K.
6-26-4
Choinski J.
Ramanathan R.[5]
6-16-2
Gonzalez A.
Ward A.
6-26-4
Kudla D.
Smyczek T.
6-757-56-3
Mcdonald M.
King D.[6]
7-56-3
Kamke T.
Garin C.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-2
Gunneswaran P.
King E.
6-26-4
Dancevic F.
Sarkissian A.
7-656-4
Fawcett T.
Bemelmans R.[1]
3-66-36-3
Krueger M.
Groth S.
6-47-5
Norrie C.[8]
Ymer E.
7-53-67-5