Guillermo Garcia Lopez vs Gastao Elias — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP3
Guillermo Garcia Lopez
43 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 September 2017
clay
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Garcia Lopez G.
7-6 3-6 6-2
Elias G.
Garcia Lopez G.
77362
Elias G.
64621

Guillermo Garcia Lopez defeated Gastao Elias 7-6 3-6 6-2 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gastao Elias came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, but Guillermo Garcia Lopez had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 5 on clay. Guillermo Garcia Lopez narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-02WimbledonR128grassGuillermo Garcia Lopez6-2 6-4 6-2
2016-07-18UmagR32clayGastao Elias6-1 6-2
2014-04-28EstorilR16clayGastao Elias6-4 3-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Garcia Lopez G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Garcia Lopez G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Garcia Lopez G.Elias G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Garcia Lopez G.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
37
Break points saved·Dominant
88
57
Break points won·Slight edge
29
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
76
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krajinovic F.[7]
Gimeno Traver D.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.[7]
Taberner C.
6-16-1
Gimeno Traver D.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Gimeno Traver D.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-20-66-2
Krajinovic F.[7]
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
6-26-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Djere L.[2]
6-36-1
Taberner C.
Heras P.
6-46-3
R16
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Robredo T.
6-34-2
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
Benchetrit E.
6-06-1
Djere L.[2]
Caruso S.
7-676-2
Ojeda Lara R.
Klizan M.
7-666-2
Krajinovic F.[7]
Moroni G.
6-46-2
Taberner C.
Sousa P.[6]
6-33-66-1
Heras P.
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-1
Gimeno Traver D.
Ungur A.
7-657-5
R32
Benchetrit E.
Donati M.
6-36-4
Caruso S.
Virgili A.
7-643-3
Sousa P.[6]
De Greef A.
6-16-4
Robredo T.
Domingues J.
7-53-67-64
Heras P.
Giustino L.
6-16-3
Djere L.[2]
Almagro N.
6-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Otte O.
6-37-62
Ungur A.
Carli C.
6-796-06-2
Klizan M.
Ruud C.
6-26-4
Ojeda Lara R.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-36-4
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
Elias G.
7-643-66-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-46-0
Krajinovic F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-26-2
Arnaboldi A.
Travaglia S.[9]
4-67-57-5
Taberner C.
Cervantes Huegun I.
7-56-2
Moroni G.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4