Tsung Hua Yang vs Peter Polansky — Gwangju CH Semi-final

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
TPE
Tsung Hua Yang
35 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2017
hard
CAN2
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Yang T.
6-4 5-7 6-2
Polansky P.
Yang T.
6562
Polansky P.
4721

Tsung Hua Yang defeated Peter Polansky 6-4 5-7 6-2 in the Gwangju CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Peter Polansky came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tsung Hua Yang claimed a first win over Peter Polansky in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Tsung Hua Yang closed it out in three sets, 6–4 5–7 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-02WimbledonQ1grassPeter Polansky4-6 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Yang T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Yang T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Yang T.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Even
57%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.5
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Yang T.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
5
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
58
82
Break points won·Even
15
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
6
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bachinger M.
Yang T.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Yang T.
Polansky P.[2]
6-45-76-2
Bachinger M.
Ito T.[5]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Polansky P.[2]
Kwon S.[8]
2-66-47-66
Ito T.[5]
Diez S.
6-26-4
Bachinger M.
Lee D.[4]
6-37-5
Yang T.
Matosevic M.
6-17-63
R16
Yang T.
Statham J.
6-757-56-1
Bachinger M.
Saville L.
6-36-4
Diez S.
Safwat M.[9]
6-26-4
Polansky P.[2]
Giron M.
6-43-67-63
Kwon S.[8]
Ochi M.
1-66-16-0
Matosevic M.
Ebden M.[3]
6-34-67-5
Lee D.[4]
Bega A.
6-46-3
Ito T.[5]
Klahn B.
7-51-66-3
R32
Klahn B.
Chen T.
6-26-2
Lee D.[4]
Kibi Y.
7-646-2
Polansky P.[2]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-4
Matosevic M.
Kim C.
6-30-66-4
Yang T.
Sekiguchi S.
7-57-64
Statham J.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-4
Ito T.[5]
Polmans M.
6-16-1
Bachinger M.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-37-65
Saville L.
Hong S.
2-66-47-62
Kwon S.[8]
Niki T.
6-46-1
Giron M.
Kuhn N.
6-47-66
Ochi M.
Takahashi Y.
3-67-56-3
Bega A.
Park J.
6-16-0
Ebden M.[3]
Sin D.
7-56-3
Diez S.
Frigerio L.
6-36-4
Safwat M.[9]
Jasika O.
7-646-3