Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Maximilian Marterer — Sibiu CH Semi-final

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER1
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2017
clay
GER5
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Stebe C.
6-2 6-1
Marterer M.
Stebe C.
662
Marterer M.
210

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Maximilian Marterer 6-2 6-1 in the Sibiu CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Maximilian Marterer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cedrik Marcel Stebe claimed a first win over Maximilian Marterer in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardMaximilian Marterer6-0 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
47
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
93
Break points won·Even
10
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.[1]
Taberner C.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Stebe C.[1]
Marterer M.[5]
6-26-1
Taberner C.
Ungur A.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Taberner C.
Fratangelo B.[6]
6-37-65
Stebe C.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-06-3
Marterer M.[5]
Ruud C.
7-646-3
Ungur A.
Travaglia S.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Taberner C.
Hampel L.
6-16-2
Ungur A.
Cecchinato M.[3]
7-56-3
Travaglia S.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-26-0
Ruud C.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
7-57-5
Napolitano S.
Satral J.
3-66-46-3
Stebe C.[1]
Cervantes Huegun I.
2-67-666-2
Fratangelo B.[6]
Bellotti R.
6-46-2
Marterer M.[5]
Donati M.
6-47-5
R32
Ruud C.
Safranek V.
6-13-0
Stebe C.[1]
Dancu V.
7-647-64
Hampel L.
Djere L.[2]
3-66-46-1
Bellotti R.
Klizan M.
6-36-1
Fratangelo B.[6]
Jahn J.
2-66-37-67
Kuzmanov D.
Muller A.
6-17-5
Travaglia S.[7]
Giustino L.
6-26-0
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Lazov A.
6-36-4
Napolitano S.
Daniel T.[8]
6-21-66-3
Ungur A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-11-66-2
Taberner C.
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Cecchinato M.[3]
Dembek M.
6-17-5
Satral J.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Marterer M.[5]
Grigelis L.
6-16-1
Donati M.
Robredo T.
6-16-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Arnaboldi A.
7-626-1