Cem Ilkel vs Maxime Janvier — Izmir CH Round of 32

Izmir CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2017
hard
Maxime Janvier
FRA
Maxime Janvier
#566ATP
1297ELO
1282Hard ELO
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Ilkel C.
7-6 3-6 6-4
Janvier M.
Ilkel C.
77362
Janvier M.
64641

Cem Ilkel defeated Maxime Janvier 7-6 3-6 6-4 in the Izmir CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cem Ilkel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final. Cem Ilkel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardCem Ilkel6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Janvier M.

Janvier M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Janvier M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
5.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
5.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Janvier M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
71
Break points won·Even
3
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Janvier M.
Freshness·
—
83

Janvier M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Robert S.
7-626-0
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Nedovyesov A.
6-31-0
Robert S.
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Petrovic D.
Bublik A.[2]
6-46-3
Nedovyesov A.
Miedler L.
6-26-3
Marchenko I.
Doumbia S.
6-736-27-67
Robert S.
Berrettini M.[4]
6-37-5
R16
Bublik A.[2]
Jankovits Y.
6-16-4
Doumbia S.
Celikbilek A.
7-53-66-1
Robert S.
Viola M.
6-46-4
Miedler L.
Vanni L.[5]
7-636-2
Nedovyesov A.
Maamoun K.
6-24-66-1
Berrettini M.[4]
Ilkel C.
7-656-3
Marchenko I.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-646-3
Petrovic D.
Setkic A.[8]
1-66-46-2
R32
Petrovic D.
Harris L.
6-7106-36-3
Setkic A.[8]
Haliak M.
6-06-3
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.
7-643-66-4
Viola M.
Agabigun S.
6-16-0
Maamoun K.
Jaziri M.[1]
7-636-4
Bublik A.[2]
Kern R.
6-13-66-4
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Popko D.
6-27-63
Berrettini M.[4]
Bonzi B.
6-46-4
Nedovyesov A.
Basic M.
7-656-2
Marchenko I.
Ilhan M.
1-66-16-4
Doumbia S.
Milojevic N.[6]
6-13-66-4
Vanni L.[5]
Yuksel A.
4-66-46-1
Jankovits Y.
Jaloviec M.
6-16-3
Robert S.
Ignatik U.[7]
6-46-2
Celikbilek A.
Haylaz M.
6-47-5
Miedler L.
Sieber M.
3-66-46-2