Tatsuma Ito vs Steven Diez — Gwangju CH Quarter-final

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN5
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2017
hard
CAN
Steven Diez
#1565ATP
35 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Ito T.
6-2 6-4
Diez S.
Ito T.
662
Diez S.
240

Tatsuma Ito defeated Steven Diez 6-2 6-4 in the Gwangju CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Steven Diez came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tatsuma Ito claimed a first win over Steven Diez in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-01WimbledonQ1grassSteven Diez6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Diez S.

Diez S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Ito T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Diez S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
1.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Diez S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
48
Break points won·Clear edge
9
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bachinger M.
Yang T.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Yang T.
Polansky P.[2]
6-45-76-2
Bachinger M.
Ito T.[5]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Polansky P.[2]
Kwon S.[8]
2-66-47-66
Ito T.[5]
Diez S.
6-26-4
Bachinger M.
Lee D.[4]
6-37-5
Yang T.
Matosevic M.
6-17-63
R16
Yang T.
Statham J.
6-757-56-1
Bachinger M.
Saville L.
6-36-4
Diez S.
Safwat M.[9]
6-26-4
Polansky P.[2]
Giron M.
6-43-67-63
Kwon S.[8]
Ochi M.
1-66-16-0
Matosevic M.
Ebden M.[3]
6-34-67-5
Lee D.[4]
Bega A.
6-46-3
Ito T.[5]
Klahn B.
7-51-66-3
R32
Klahn B.
Chen T.
6-26-2
Lee D.[4]
Kibi Y.
7-646-2
Polansky P.[2]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-4
Matosevic M.
Kim C.
6-30-66-4
Yang T.
Sekiguchi S.
7-57-64
Statham J.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-4
Ito T.[5]
Polmans M.
6-16-1
Bachinger M.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-37-65
Saville L.
Hong S.
2-66-47-62
Kwon S.[8]
Niki T.
6-46-1
Giron M.
Kuhn N.
6-47-66
Ochi M.
Takahashi Y.
3-67-56-3
Bega A.
Park J.
6-16-0
Ebden M.[3]
Sin D.
7-56-3
Diez S.
Frigerio L.
6-36-4
Safwat M.[9]
Jasika O.
7-646-3