Adrian Ungur vs Marco Cecchinato — Sibiu CH Round of 16

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ROU
Adrian Ungur
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 September 2017
clay
Marco Cecchinato
ITA3
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
Ungur A.
7-5 6-3
Cecchinato M.
Ungur A.
762
Cecchinato M.
530

Adrian Ungur defeated Marco Cecchinato 7-5 6-3 in the Sibiu CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Adrian Ungur came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Adrian Ungur closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ungur A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Cecchinato M.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ungur A.

Serve advantage — Ungur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ungur A.Cecchinato M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ungur A.Cecchinato M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
42
Break points saved·Dominant
61
89
Break points won·Even
23
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
29
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
34
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ungur A.Cecchinato M.
Freshness·
—
69

Cecchinato M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.[1]
Taberner C.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Stebe C.[1]
Marterer M.[5]
6-26-1
Taberner C.
Ungur A.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Taberner C.
Fratangelo B.[6]
6-37-65
Stebe C.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-06-3
Marterer M.[5]
Ruud C.
7-646-3
Ungur A.
Travaglia S.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Taberner C.
Hampel L.
6-16-2
Ungur A.
Cecchinato M.[3]
7-56-3
Travaglia S.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-26-0
Ruud C.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
7-57-5
Napolitano S.
Satral J.
3-66-46-3
Stebe C.[1]
Cervantes Huegun I.
2-67-666-2
Fratangelo B.[6]
Bellotti R.
6-46-2
Marterer M.[5]
Donati M.
6-47-5
R32
Ruud C.
Safranek V.
6-13-0
Stebe C.[1]
Dancu V.
7-647-64
Hampel L.
Djere L.[2]
3-66-46-1
Bellotti R.
Klizan M.
6-36-1
Fratangelo B.[6]
Jahn J.
2-66-37-67
Kuzmanov D.
Muller A.
6-17-5
Travaglia S.[7]
Giustino L.
6-26-0
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Lazov A.
6-36-4
Napolitano S.
Daniel T.[8]
6-21-66-3
Ungur A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-11-66-2
Taberner C.
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Cecchinato M.[3]
Dembek M.
6-17-5
Satral J.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Marterer M.[5]
Grigelis L.
6-16-1
Donati M.
Robredo T.
6-16-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Arnaboldi A.
7-626-1