Ernesto Escobedo vs Patrick Kypson — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
MEX1
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 September 2017
hard
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Escobedo E.
6-1 7-6
Kypson P.
Escobedo E.
6772
Kypson P.
1600

Ernesto Escobedo defeated Patrick Kypson 6-1 7-6 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

  • Match story: Ernesto Escobedo came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escobedo E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escobedo E.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escobedo E.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
93
Break points won·Dominant
12
41
Deciding sets·Even
16
17
Tiebreaks·Even
72
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Escobedo E.Kypson P.
Freshness·
—
94

Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
King K.
Norrie C.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Norrie C.
Arevalo M.
6-06-4
King K.
Rubin N.[6]
6-24-66-4
Quarter-finals
Arevalo M.
Krueger M.[5]
6-36-0
Rubin N.[6]
Garin C.[9]
6-46-2
King K.
Mena F.
7-626-4
Norrie C.
Mcdonald M.[7]
6-16-3
R16
Norrie C.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-32-66-2
Arevalo M.
Zlobinsky J.
6-27-65
Krueger M.[5]
Blumberg W.
6-26-2
Rubin N.[6]
Sorgi J.
6-46-2
King K.
Escobedo E.[1]
3-67-56-3
Mcdonald M.[7]
Harrison C.
6-37-5
Mena F.
Novikov D.[8]
6-46-3
Garin C.[9]
Bambridge L.
6-16-4
R32
Mena F.
Haviland R.
6-34-0
Krueger M.[5]
Spencer W.
7-646-3
Norrie C.
Bangoura S.
6-26-3
Zlobinsky J.
Galarneau A.
6-45-77-5
Blumberg W.
Klein B.
6-27-65
Rubin N.[6]
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Novikov D.[8]
Krajicek A.
4-67-57-5
Mcdonald M.[7]
Ward A.
6-36-2
Sandgren T.[2]
Pavic A.
6-46-4
King K.
Hiltzik J.
6-27-66
Arevalo M.
Mmoh M.[3]
5-2
Escobedo E.[1]
Kypson P.
6-17-60
Harrison C.
Vukic A.
6-37-5
Bambridge L.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-653-67-62
Sorgi J.
Mansouri S.
6-46-3
Garin C.[9]
Sarmiento R.
6-26-3